Suppose some accused child is 10 years old. That child is of normal intelligence , good in studies, intelligently performs his day to day activities ;does it mean.....
that child can't be of immature understanding & can't take benefit of section 83 of Indian Penal Code???
Must some accused be of low I.Q. or of unsound mind or mentally retarded or Idiot or lunatic or mentally abnormal to take benefit of section 83 of IPC to prove immaturity of understanding???
So how maturity & level of understanding of that accused child of 10 yrs old, is decided to give him benefit of sec. 83 of IPC in India?
2007-06-27
14:28:48
·
1 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics