Will Hillary Clinton's plan for Iran keep the USA safe from nuclear attack?

Question

Hillary wants a dialogue with Iran as the U.S. tries to thwart the country's pursuit of nuclear weapons.

Or

The Bush administration has rejected direct negotiations with Ahmadinejad and has instead pursued international economic sanctions to stop the country's nuclear weapons development.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070627/ap_on_el_pr/democrats_foreign_policy_6;_ylt=AoHwHwtcC2kWp8HwB2QPRkytOrgF

Enemies of the Iranian nation should be dealt such a heavy blow that do not even think of attacking Iran," said President Ahmadineja

Answer 1

Surprise.......Bush's plan is working. The Iranians may be swimming in oil, but they import over 60% of their gasoline because of a lack of refineries.
Because of Bush's plan of economic sanctions, the Iranian government instituted gasoline rationing, and lo and behold, the followers of the tolerant and peaceful religion set 19 gas stations on fire, several vehicles and ramsacked or destroyed several other stations. They were actually shouting rather derogatory things about Ahmadinejad.
Even Iran can't muddle through such civil disobediance for long - and, didn't I read recently about a discontinuence of their nuclear ambitions in approximately three weeks?
As a side note, when America was pretty much shut down in the mid seventies by OPEC's embargo - there were long lines and very angry people - but no gas stations were looted or burned nor was there any psycho demonstrations in the streets. Do you still feel we can effectively have a meaningful "dialog" with these radicals?

Answer 2

Negotiation is not an effective means to change the policy of a country that does not adhere to rules about nuclear weapons development. Thus, Hillary Clinton need not have a dialogue with Iran and it might affect her quest for the Presidency.

VOTE fore your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know if Hillary will likely win.

Answer 3

Talking to Iran and pursuing international sanctions are not necessarily mutually exclusive policies.

Answer 4

Will Hillary have a "lets chat" session with that little madman wearing a burqua like the ridiculous Nancy Pelosi did with the terrorist Assad?

Answer 5

Hillary Clinton's plan for anything will not keep the USA safer

Answer 6

Lets say Iran SOMEHOW was able to build a bomb -- what intercontinental missile tech would they use to get it here BEFORE Iran was scrabbed by 15 thousand of OUR missiles?

You're DREAMING love...

Answer 7

all i know is she get in to office I'm moving to Canada cues the thought of her in charge of anything scare,s the s*&%$ out of me

Answer 8

talk, talk talk will never get through to those third world war mongering leaders. The ONLY language they understand is "action."

Answer 9

NO!!