Or do you make up your mind before you know all the facts?
2007-06-27 11:52:10 · 12 answers · asked by F-1 says KISS IT! 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Always both sides.
2007-06-27 11:55:25 · answer #1 · answered by asmikeocsit 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends on what I'm doing. If I'm trying to lend emotional support to one person, then I accept that whatever their view of the situation is true for them. If I'm going to be intervening between the two of them, then I must hear both sides before making a judgment.
Most of the time, though, I have very little impact on people's lives, because my philosophy is that people need to make up their own mind about what to do with their life. I don't try to pressure people into doing what I think when they should do when they tell me a story from their life. Therefore, I feel fairly safe if I can only hear just one side of the story and respond.
Since it's tough to get both people in a disagreement to talk to you about a situation, then being able to hear only one side is pretty common. So I often just have to make do with what information I have, and I accept that of course there's going to be more than I know to a situation.... Even if I had the benefit of hearing both sides of the story, I would still think that there's probably more to the story than I'm being told... I always reserve some room for doubt about any judgments, because I figure there's a good chance that somewhere along the line I'm going to be missing some information.
2007-06-27 12:18:41 · answer #2 · answered by Kestra SpiritNova 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both sides,always.
2007-06-27 11:56:01 · answer #3 · answered by Ms Lety 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends if I want to hear the other side of the story, maybe it's someone I don't trust.
2007-06-27 12:04:14 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
in case you want to be honest to the two components then the two components could be heard. in simple terms like once you're in court docket. while you're making a hasty judgement and leap to a conclusions, then the two components are no longer particularly judged. once you're listening to the two components the two components sense they're continuously top, no exchange. The ringmaster who could be you, would be judging each and each components of punches and hits under the belt like in a boxing tournament. you're able to weigh all circumstances. once you weigh the data of the concern then you certainly will truthfully know the best deal of the entire attitude after which you will see all of it for sure.
2016-10-03 06:02:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I want to know both sides, unless there`s clearly something out of whack. Like a hit & run, or abuse or something I don`t need too much additional information to decide those.
2007-06-27 11:56:44 · answer #6 · answered by wwhrd 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To be fair to all parties I must listen to both sides to render an equitable judgment
2007-06-27 12:05:07 · answer #7 · answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I want to hear all three sides - his side-her side- and the truth
2007-06-27 11:55:42 · answer #8 · answered by Lolitta 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't need to hear both sides--I want to--and then I can decide for myself. I usually eserve judgement on things.
2007-06-27 11:55:53 · answer #9 · answered by Jess 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no I want both sides
2007-06-27 11:54:11 · answer #10 · answered by marsh 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋