Poor, poor taste. Showed her true side as far as I'm concerned.
2007-06-27 11:51:04 · 19 answers · asked by El Duderino 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Coulter is a shock jockey. If she doesn't say horrible and offensive things nobody will pay attention to her or buy her terrible books. She's a piece of trash and a joke.
2007-06-27 11:57:57 · answer #1 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Ann Coulter needs to be arrested , bringing up John Edwards son being killed in a car wreck, wasn't he 16 years.old . What in world is the crazy cross dresser think she is doing. When their son was killed it put both of them in a deep state of depression. I can't believe that some old sorry hag like Ann Coulter would bring up a child being killed in a car wreck in her smart remarks.. That woman has no respect for anyone, she going to have to pay because Elizabeth &John Edwards are both are Lawyers. She run Edwards down and now starting on his deceased son, I would file suit against her for defamation of character on her.
I can't beleive any human would stoop that low, what if it was your child, I weep for both of them. What sorry bit** that long necked horse face looking hag. She is nuts has no respect for anyone, My Lord.
2007-06-27 19:14:27 · answer #2 · answered by Nicki 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because Ann Coulter is a crazy biotch! But Edwards is a big phoney. But i wouldn't talk about thier son that died, thats heartless!
2007-06-27 18:54:17 · answer #3 · answered by jeb black 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ann Coulter is a sick individual. She makes lots of money by spewing hate and being as outrageous as possible. She has no conscience. The propagandists of the Third Reich had nothing on her and she even uses some of their material.
2007-06-27 19:00:32 · answer #4 · answered by tribeca_belle 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Agreed. I think Edwards' was right on the money and Coulter simply twisted the dialog to serve her own purposes.
2007-06-27 18:54:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I must have missed this story, but let me say that she was wrong if she did this. No one's dead loved one should be used as the blunt of any joke. It concerns me that we would let someone get away with this kind of behavior.
2007-06-27 19:05:21 · answer #6 · answered by bellslady65 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The right loves to defend her by saying the left doesn't get her "humor" or the substance behind her "style". The simple fact is that she is a greedy pig who would become a democrat in a heartbeat if she thought it would fatten her bank account.
2007-06-27 19:01:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
As tasteless as that crude statement about the widows of the 911 victims.
2007-06-27 18:54:51 · answer #8 · answered by flushles 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Publicity to sell books. Plain and simple.
2007-06-27 18:56:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
If you're evil enough to cheer lead for the Bush administration, you're evil enough to use another person's pain as a means of attack. After all, he/she said that the 9/11 wives are "enjoying their husbands' death so much"!
2007-06-27 18:55:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋