After the 767 jet liner crashed into the world trade center building creating the worst terror attack in history, a fire burned for 56 minutes inside the World Trade Center building number two. The top 20 floors of the building collapsed on the 90 floors below. The entire one hundred and ten-story building collapsed in 8 seconds...
After a fire burned inside WTC tower number one for 102 minutes, the top 30 floors collapsed on the lower 80 floors. And the entire one hundred and ten stories of this building collapsed in 10 seconds.
You can say the reason they collapsed was they were struck with a 185 ton jet airliner and the 24,000 gallons of jet fuel caused a fire of 1500 to 2000 degrees F which weakened the steel and caused the collapse. Any questions??? http://vincentdunn.com/wtc.html
2007-06-27 11:29:30 · 14 answers · asked by ? 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Drew,
Scenes, like that still bother me. And the rhetoric is still very much insulting. I firmly believe that they know this isn't true. But they try to slam Our president with statements that just aren't possible. They do not have any substance. And they have no core values to base their opinions on. So they search for meaningless attacks. To control the Kool-Aid Drinkers. Problem is, these kinds of mindless insults. Are always gonna be around. In order to be critical of Our President. George W. Bush!
2007-06-28 00:00:58 · answer #1 · answered by Nunya Bidniss 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well the reason there are questions are.. Number one The building were specifically designed to withstand a commerce jet impact. Number two Jet fuel doesn't burn at 2000 degrees it burns at 1100. To get a fire at 2000 degrees it needs to be controlled. Which a building fire is NOT, and if the fire was 2000 degrees you wouldn't have seen people hanging out the windows. They would have been incinerated. Number three "which is the biggest one" is the buildings collapsed on top of themselves at free fall speed. Like you said about 10 seconds. So how does a building collapse at free fall speed? If the top 30 floors fell into the floors below them. The floors below them which are made of concrete and steel would have created some resistance. There for slowing the fall of the building. There for "NOT" falling at free fall speed. It would have taken longer then 10 sec. The only way the building could have come down that fast is if the lower floors where blown out first. You say Conspiracy crackpots, but you have to be a naive nit-with to believe the story that was fed to you. Not only is it physically and mathematically impossible, but incredible ridicules to anybody with half a working brain. Do some freaking research. Then maybe think for your self for a change.. Here anybody that doesn't have their head up their butt can look. It's not Conspiracy Theory. It's logic thought and reason.
http://www.members.shaw.ca/truth911/truth911/index.htm
2007-06-27 18:48:02 · answer #2 · answered by usefulidiot230 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I am not really a conspiracy theorist but I always wondered about these things
How did the hijackers get on the planes in the first place? Why were there no warnings given to Airlines in light of the President's daily briefing Bin Laden determined to attack in US? Why were air traffic control tapes destroyed on 9/11? WHy was Dick Cheney running a war games that took planes 1000 miles from the East coast that morning? Why didn't NORAD fulfil its standard operating procedure and intercept the planes? Were NORAD intentionally confused by the wargames taking place on the morning of 9/11 or were they ordered to stand down?
How did a plane reported missing make a left turn at Albany and fly straight down the Hudson River not get intercepted? why were no planes scrambled to intercept the other planes?
2007-06-27 18:47:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Many of the folks who are keeping a vigilant eye on the dark curtain of fascism sweeping the country will say that the problem is not necessarily with I and II. The greater problems lie with 7 and with the Pentagon...and with Silverstein stating that we "decided to pull it."
Now then.....what is the budget for interent disinformation?
It is well beyond obvious that the same OPS manual is disseminated throughout the ranks. Jargon such as 'moonbats and tin foil hats and conspiracy nutcases' keep getting used so repetively that it doesn't take an NSA codebreaker to think this through. The English language has a prolific number of equally suitable slanderous words.
2007-06-27 18:41:04 · answer #4 · answered by Watched 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oddly enough about a year prior to the attack, a documentary stated that hitting the towers with a plane would bring them down.
2007-06-27 18:32:46 · answer #5 · answered by Dull Jon 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
That may be how it happened, but you don't know what was going on behind the scenes in the years before. 9-11 was a long time in the making, and Clinton had a big hand in it.
2007-06-27 18:36:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
In other countries they move on not dwelling on the last terrorist attack on their country and who did it they know. In their country, sadly, they are usually talking about the most recent one.
2007-06-27 18:37:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Thanks! I love that website. But why are they so many idiots in AMerica who wants us to believe that it happen as inside job? I like the fact that after that happen the whole nation every where were united and awake to go after them. We were then a whole nation with one purpose in mind until Laura told us to go back to our regular lives and broke that wonderful feeling that we all had.
2007-06-27 18:41:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Dull jon...can you provide a link to that document..?
2007-06-27 18:34:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Thank you for that public service!!!
I am sure the conspiracy theory crackpots will still find something to disagree with you about.
2007-06-27 18:42:00 · answer #10 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋