English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Libs please answer the following and explain. (Remember, insults make me look right.)

1) What is more important?
a) Saving a baby white rino
b) Saving a baby seal
c) Saving an unborn human

2) What fight is more important?
a) Global Warming (no death toll)
b) Terrorism (3000+ state side and another 3500+ heros DEFENDING us)

3) What should be done first?
a) Finding a war crime that can be charged against Bush
b) Charging Teddy Kennedy for vehicular homocide

4) Who should run health care?
a) Private business who operates a multitude of succesfull business everyone used daily, safely
b) The government, who can't operate the Post Office or DMV succesfully

Lastly - Should the media content be controlled by?
a) The government - dictating what is said or shown
b) The market - allowing people to choose what they want

2007-06-27 11:00:15 · 21 answers · asked by JonB 5 in Politics & Government Politics

21 answers

OUTSTANDING questions. But don't expect any reasonable answers from the left. Liberals WANT us to lose in Iraq. They WANT us to fail in the global war on terror. They WANT the economy to take a dump. They WANT you to lose your job. They WANT you to lose your home. They WANT you to be absolutely miserable. And they WANT the United States to fail in every way so that maybe......just maybe.......you'll be desperate enough to vote for them.

2007-06-27 11:03:39 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 4 8

I'm a centrist, neither liberal or conservative but I'll give it a shot even though you didn't ask me.

1) What is more important?
a) Saving a baby white rino
b) Saving a baby seal
c) Saving an unborn human

My answer: All of the above. No life is more important nor superior to any other.

2) What fight is more important?
a) Global Warming (no death toll)
b) Terrorism (3000+ state side and another 3500+ heros DEFENDING us)

My answer: A and B are both correct. One has nothing to do with the other but they are both vitally important to humans. Not so important to many other life forms though.

3) What should be done first?
a) Finding a war crime that can be charged against Bush
b) Charging Teddy Kennedy for vehicular homocide

My answer: Neither should be done at all. There is no evidence that a crime was committed by either Bush nor Kennedy.

4) Who should run health care?
a) Private business who operates a multitude of succesfull business everyone used daily, safely
b) The government, who can't operate the Post Office or DMV succesfully

My answer: A

Lastly - Should the media content be controlled by?
a) The government - dictating what is said or shown
b) The market - allowing people to choose what they want

My answer: Who should control media content is a moot question. Media content is chosen by the viewers and readers whom the advertisers pay the media corporations to expose their products to.

2007-06-27 18:13:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

1) What is more important?
a) Saving a baby white rino
its endangered and alive

2) What fight is more important?
a) Global Warming (no death toll)
you can stop global warming and the death toll is everyone--no one wants to have to go outside with buckets of sun screen and New York doesn't want to be flooded. Terrorism can only be solved by peace--Osama got what he wanted: a religious war.

3) What should be done first?
a) Finding a war crime that can be charged against Bush
b) Charging Teddy Kennedy for vehicular homocide
both: one's done through congress, one isn't. why should we have to pick and let the other run off?

4) Who should run health care?
a) Private business who operates a multitude of succesfull business everyone used daily, safely
safely? where have you been?
b) The government, who can't operate the Post Office or DMV succesfully
how has the post office been crap? it comes 6 days a week and the DMV is only crap because you're 50 and still haven't passed the drive test

Lastly - Should the media content be controlled by?
a) The government - dictating what is said or shown
b) The market - allowing people to choose what they want
it should be ontroled by no one! people don't get to see what they want or need to see, they see what sells. bad news sells. war sells. terrorism is winning sells. al qada being preoccupied with Shittes doesn't sell.

2007-06-27 18:30:59 · answer #3 · answered by Bohemian 3 · 3 0

Way to phrase your questions in an unbiased manner. I'll answer them anyway.

1) a - baby white rhino because it's an endangered species. Seals are not. Unborn human is just a fetus, though that depends on how developed it is. Since you didn't specify which trimester, I'll stick with the rhino.

2) The World Health Organization estimates that global warming is currently responsible for 150,000 deaths each year, so your question is incorrect. Add to that the fact that more will die as the effects of global warming worsen and the fact that hardly any Americans are affected by terrorism, and the answer is a - global warming by a landslide.

3) Considering that Bush's war is responsible for about 650,000 deaths, obviously the answer is a - charging Bush with a crime. Kennedy's case has been investigated already.

4) Considering that we currently have the most expensive and one of the worst health care systems of any developed country, the answer is b - the government should run it.

5) Current system is fine - have public airwaves and cable stations.

2007-06-27 18:17:25 · answer #4 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 3 0

1. Dumb question. Not an insult...just a fact. Who in their right mind would be forced to choose between those three? It just doesn't make any sense. And if you can't understand that point, then it is hopeless.

2. Again, who says you have to fight one, and not the other? Actually, I have a suggestion: why not get America energy independent, and then we won't have to worry about protecting our overseas oil supplies against terrorists, and at the same time, we might go a little greener?

3. One more time...you can do one without the other, or both at the same time, or neither. Although I'm glad the democrats are after the truth with at least the wiretapping. Next stop: the billion dollar profits Cheney is pulling in with Halliburton over the Iraq war.

4. HMO's are stealing money by overcharging everything, forcing insurance costs up, which come from our paycheck. The government also cannot do a good job. How about a combination of stricter oversight over HMO's? They may be competent, I do agree with you there. But, without oversight, it is far too easy to become corrupt. And until they insure every American, I would like government interference...to at least aid in getting every American insured, or at least every child.

5. Parents need to stay home and keep their kids off the tele. Stop using it as a babysitting device. Violence, adult themes, and sexual innuendos are pounding our youths through television, movies, and video games. I think within the next ten years you will begin seeing a definite increase in real life crime by these "tele babies".

2007-06-27 18:15:16 · answer #5 · answered by powhound 7 · 4 0

LOL, you don't happen to make a living polling for the Whitehouse do you? Some of these questions seem a little slanted...

1) C- Humans first. But saving in what sense? Are you trying to save their souls? Their lives, their well-being? If Republicans would ease up on condom distribution, there wouldn't be so many prebabies in danger of being aborted.

2) B- Ending the farcical "War on Terror" is of the utmost importance. There is nothing to gain by staying in Iraq, as their government has proven itself incompetent as an ally against terror; and nothing to lose by leaving, because Al Qaeda simply doesn't have enough size or organization to run a country any more efficiently than the current failed attempt at democracy. The Iraqis, as a people, simply aren't ready for such an advanced form of governing.

3) A- Nailing Bush. Just because he's slippery, doesn't mean he shouldn't be held accountable. The President of the United States does not get to hand off the blame for making poor decisions based on faulty intelligence. The decision to go to war was his, and so was the decision to lie about the reason.

4) A- I tend to leave most things to the Free Market, but Healthcare may be an exception. The Free Market relies on consumers capping the value by rejecting services that are overpriced. In the case of medical care, that simply isn't possible. People will pay any price to survive, and it's not right for leeches and vultures to prey on that. A healthy society is a stronger, smarter, and more productive society. Besides, 75% of the cost is Insurance companies milking both ends- patients for Medical insurance, and doctors for malpractice. Nationalize the entire industry, draft all the doctors into military service, and we'll see the benefits trickle up into the free market.

5) Media content should not be orchestrated by either. The current state of journalism is hardly better than if it were State-controlled.

2007-06-27 18:44:22 · answer #6 · answered by Beardog 7 · 3 1

Sir, your question couldn't make you look further "right" than any insult.
1. Saving our soldiers, get them out of Iraq.
2. The fight against our corrupt leadership.
3. Secure our borders.
4. I don't care who runs it, make it not for profit.
5. Do we still have a first amendment?

6. You express no faith in the government's ability to run things, yet you want it to be in charge of saving the unborn. Your scorn for anyone challenging the President is obvious, so is your venom about Kennedy. Health care sure is successful, they're making a fortune off us.

2007-06-27 18:33:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

One might get the implication that it has to be one or the other, and since that is not true, I'll answer without that parameter.

1- save all when able.

2- Fight both constructively.

3- a, is relevant now.
b, is old unfortuanate news about 1 senator amongest many.

4- a with considerate and helpful guidelines established by b.

5- Can we just scrape the media and start fresh?

Ya know, so we might have a millisecond of unbias news?

Not a defined liberal, just an average American expecting better from our government, hope it's okay I answered.

2007-06-27 18:10:22 · answer #8 · answered by sagebella 5 · 3 0

1. I'd say Rhino. Bringing another child into this world that isnt wanted and can't be raised with any love or care is not a very pressing need.

2. Terrorism. We need the oil, keep sacrificing the youth of America!

3. Ted Kennedy is a prick. I'd go after kennedy first. Just let Bush sulk out of the White House with his head hung in embarrament. He knows he is one of this nation's worst presidents- why rub it in?

4. It doesn't matter. As long as we are talking about America, anyone who is in charge of health care will run it improperly.

5. Again, Government will distort the news and market (see "robber baron scam artist businessmen") will too. We're picking our poison regardless.

2007-06-27 18:09:15 · answer #9 · answered by Gideon 3 · 4 1

1:A - The white rhino is endangered and a human fetus is not a viable creature to begin with
2:A - Global Warming has the potential to be disastrous to our economy. Also, you can't fight a war against a method.
3:C - If Bush is guilty of any of any war crimes he should be charged, but time should not be spent trying to find or invent one. Kennedy already plead guilty to the charges decades ago, get over it.
4:C - Neither are effective means
5:B-ish - The government should have no censorship powers, but the ownership of all forms of media by a few companies damages democracy.

Also; if insulting you makes you right, do insulting questions make us right?

2007-06-27 18:10:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

1.a and b i dont care about animals and c the baby is not born so unless the mother is in trouble the baby doesnt need help
2. A. i dont kno wat u mean by no death toll but global warming is more important
3. definately finding something wrong with bush i dont think it would be that hard to find something
4.the goverment cant really run a bussiness i mean if it was good at it the lines at the DMV wouldnt be so long and the ppl there wouldnt act like *****
5. the goverment should not run it i mean they are the most powerful ppl on earth and cant hear the word sh!t and they cant see a boob on tv

2007-06-27 18:09:16 · answer #11 · answered by Albert 3 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers