I noticed some years ago that anti-smoking media campiagns has shifted from "don't smoke, it's bad for you" to "don't let others smoke, or second-hand smoke will kill you."
Second-hand smoke has been shown to cause health problems in some people - such as career waitresses in smoke-filled bars - but, no one is being killed by the guy smoking a cigarette outside on his break. Tailpipes cause vastly more air polution than cigarette butts.
An outright ban is just absurd. Not lighting up around people who might be bothered by it - asthmatics, those of us (like myself) who simply don't like the smell, or paranoid hypochondriacs - is just common curtesy. That should be enough.
2007-06-27 10:09:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, at least she wouldn't be prosecuted for fraud. Not unless there's a specific question as to illegal drug use on the application forms...And the last time I applied for and collected unemployment benefits there wasn't any. However your wife probably would end up loosing her benefits if the EDD found out she blew a couple job interviews because of testing positive for controlled substances. Fraud would be providing false employer contacts, continuing to claim benefits after you start working again or as I said earlier falsifying or leaving out information on the application forms. You're confusing eligibility with availability. If one states they're available to work full time but they aren't because of some sort of commitments that would be a fraud.
2016-05-17 16:55:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by celina 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, it has been proven that sales go up and companies are more profitable as a result of smoking bans.
1. More people attend concerts, clubs and restaurants than before. (You'd be surprised how many people NEVER go because of health reasons, allergy to smoke, being pregnant, etc.)
2. The workplace is healthier for employees, and it has been proven to lead to fewer sick days and fewer health claims, and less turnover. And anyone in the restaurant business knows that turnover is high. Anything to bring that number down is great, since it costs anywhere from $500 - $2000 or more to hire and train a new employee.
2007-06-27 09:50:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Two points.
First, I can't believe you actually think this is a free country. Not for years has this place been even remotely free, because true freedom is a myth. It does not, and has never, existed.
Two, the smoking ban is coming in because smokers wouldn't bend to accomodate non smokers, so the government brought in a law to break you instead. That's how it works.
2007-06-27 09:53:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Beastie 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Less unemployment. Free as long as no one else is harmed. Perhaps you should try out for the new sitcom based on the GEICO commercials.
2007-06-27 09:45:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by RE 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
these people can resort to other ways of 'smoking' such as the nicottine gum, patch or gel
2007-06-30 19:50:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your right it is a free country friend that is why this so called ban is so important as it give's "Everybody" not just smokers !!! The right to choose whether to breath in poison or not. It's not a blanket ban after all, let's get some perspective on this :)
2007-06-27 09:46:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 7
·
3⤊
5⤋
its only do gooders that can afford coputors .they like to have a winge. s---- m m all.minded people.let them choke on car fumes.they will probbablyy bore us to death .power to the smokers.
2007-06-27 10:00:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by GEOFF W 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Feeling stressed.........maybe you should have a cig whahaha!
2007-06-27 09:44:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by cleocat 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Damn dude, go get yourself some nicotine patches.
2007-06-27 09:44:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by thegubmint 7
·
1⤊
3⤋