English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ted Turner, Bono, Angelina Jolie, Brat Pitt, Maurice Strong, etc. Why do Globalist institutions, which were founded and are funded by international bankers and transnational corporations, DEMAND that the working poor of America pay to end Third World poverty when they have all the money. The Rothschild international banking dynasty alone has, collectively, assets worth upwards of the equivalent of 400 TRILLION dollars! America's net worth is only 7 trillion and the Rothschild-own Federal Reserve Bank confirmed last year that America is currently 50 trillion in debt. Why aren't the super rich willing to pay for ending world poverty, hunger, etc. They fund both sides of every war, they destroyed our industrial base, they outsource our jobs, and now they want us to pay for ending world poverty?? WTF????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-06-27 08:07:34 · 14 answers · asked by Joe C 1 in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

You know, share yours so I can keep all mine scenario.

2007-06-27 08:23:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think you're blaming the wrong people as the enemy.
It's the Republican approach that has cut taxes of super rich that make you have to pay more for everything from gasoline to healthcare, and maybe your taxes went up a bit, too. But it's the big bullies taking your money more than the champions of the poor.
The GOP plan ends up with more middle class falling off into poverty, so you're feeling the crunch, and I empathize, but
The democrat plan that would raise taxes on people making over $250,000 would better help you stay in the middle class and help a number of people "below you" to take a step up too. Unless you're a wealthy stockholder or property owner, it sounds like you vote against your own interests and kick down at poor folks (who are mostly single moms and children). And Brat Pitt and them probably vote against their own $$$ interests as they vote Democrat. They could surely keep more of their money with Republican policies.

2007-06-27 08:20:50 · answer #2 · answered by topink 6 · 0 0

Um, you might want to do a little reading. Your question makes absolutely no sense. Not even the farthest right-wing Senator or Congressman has accused the Democratic party of that, and you know they would if they could.

Liberals - Democrats - do not "want to take from the American working lower class," they have fought hard and are still fighting to stop Bush and the Republican Congress' efforts to shift the tax burden from the wealthiest Americans to "the American working lower class."

2007-06-27 08:17:05 · answer #3 · answered by Don P 5 · 4 0

Your myth of "job creators" describes the same group of people who have been undermining American industry and dismantling viable companies to sell off the parts for decades. The more you tax non-Americans, the more they leave. Yes. This is true. But, If the rules are set up to make it difficult to sell in America unless these "job creators" actually pay competitive taxes, you'll see less people leaving. If Tina Turner wants to avoid taxes by denouncing her American citizenship, impose an import tariff on every transaction which leaves the US for her foreign bank account. And, please, please, look at a graph of unemployment under Bush and Obama. It definitively shows that circumstances under Bush created the problem. And, circumstances under Obama have slowed and begun to correct it.

2016-05-17 16:12:01 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I guess you never heard of the work that Ms. Jolie has done for the UN or the donations that she has given to orphanages or the work that Mr. Pitt does for NOLA.
Or that Mr. Strong left the Power Corp. of Canada with a salary of $35,000?

2007-06-27 08:27:22 · answer #5 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 0 0

No, they demand that people who are wealthy and have a lot of disposable income help out the poor and middle class, get your facts right. No liberal or democrat wants to take more money from the middle class than the rich. Nice right-wing trick, though, the simple-minded might just buy it.

2007-06-27 08:13:22 · answer #6 · answered by Frank 6 · 4 1

"Why do rich White Liberals want to TAKE from the American working lower middle class, and give to the poor??" you ask?

Why do rich white conservatives want to take from the poor hard working Americans who keep the country going and give to the rich?

2007-06-27 08:13:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7 3

Cause they are to cheap to take it out of their own pockets how do you think they got rich.

2007-06-27 08:14:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Very good question. They find ways to avoid paying themselves, but shift the burden to the middle class.

2007-06-27 08:13:17 · answer #9 · answered by Leah 6 · 1 5

you have been brainwashed my friend by the conservative party and big business.............

Big Bis. is the f'ing over the middle class.......are you new?

2007-06-27 08:27:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers