A recent responder suggested that Lib's were better people by instituting welfare for the nations poor. While conservatives were evil for cutting programs.
For you Lib's, please address this issue: "Give a man a fish and his full for a day. Teach a man to fish he full for life." Most "cuts" in welfare revolve around this idea. That instead of just handing money around, we need to educate people to make money for themselves. How is forcing people to get a job, bad? How is making people responsible for THEMSELVES, bad? Don't give me excuses for people not to work, few can hold water. Instead address your desire to spread money everywhere some one is down on their luck. Explain why every Lib wants an increase in welfare (yes every, if you vote liberally, you vote to increase welfare even if you personally don't belive it) . Fine, have the Lib's pay for it if they belive in it. Put YOUR money were your mouth is, not my money.
2007-06-27 04:40:15 · 5 answers · asked by JonB 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Simple-welfare=control
2007-06-27 04:44:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
agreed. I believe that if there HAS to be programs, its should be for people to get back on their feet. like a free GED program, or internship training systems for older individuals thereby giving them the basic and necessary skills to enter the workforce. handing them a blank check wont do anything.
2007-06-27 11:57:43 · answer #2 · answered by Random Black Woman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Down with "Kids Care", Medicare and Social Security!
2007-06-27 11:43:27 · answer #3 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
your right it should be changed i see ppl having kids after kids in order to get more money
2007-06-27 12:33:09 · answer #4 · answered by kina 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
liberals don't care about people as long as they can controll them
2007-06-27 11:45:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋