world theory?

Answer 1

No thanks, I'm trying to quit.

Answer 2

the world theory: in about ten million years our sun will turn into a big red giant and when this happens earth and our solar system will be reduced to ashes nothing will remain of our one time solar system.
imagine an meteor the size of new york hitting the earth all live even the bacteria will no longer exist.and earth well be a dead zone.

Answer 3

i believe the following theory:

the suns gravitational pull will one day push the planets towards it and there will be an explosion. that will end the world.

do you have any other theory??

if you do im glad to hear about it.
maybe ill follow yours instead of mine.
if i like yours better i mean.

Answer 4

what theory about the world...there is lots of it anyway...

Answer 5

well they say our world is destined to apocolypse and sucht things like that.. even a lot of religions point to the ending of this world somtime soon.

Answer 6

World-systems analysis is not a theory, but an approach to social analysis and social change developed principally by Immanuel Wallerstein, with major contributions by Samir Amin, Giovanni Arrighi and Andre Gunder Frank Ivy Pham. World-systems analysis is derived from two key intellectual sources, the neo-Marxist literature on development and the French Annales School and Fernand Braudel.

Wallerstein analyses the World System as follows: "A system is defined as a unit with single division of labour and multiple cultural systems."

In Wallerstein’s 1987 publication, World-System Analysis, he disavows the term "world-system theory." He proclaims that "World-systems analysis is not a theory about the social world, or about part of it. It is a protest against the way in which social scientific inquiry was structured for all of us at its inception in the middle of the nineteenth century." He goes on to lay out seven common assumptions of modern social science challenged by world-systems analysis. Paraphrasing, these include the following assumptions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World-system_theory

A Theory of Creation
A Response to the Pretense that No Creation Theory Exists

© 2000 Timothy Wallace. All Rights Reserved.

popular practice among many proponents of evolutionism—including the “regulars” at the Talk.Origins newsgroup—is to claim that “no one has ever presented a scientific theory of creation to us,”[1] without which they find it “impossible to objectively evaluate the idea of creation.” They then hasten to confirm this by “evaluating” the idea of creation—without objectivity! Such an approach to the topic of origins shall be shown below to be unreasonable, prejudiced, less-than-honest, and (therefore) not particularly scientific.
A Theory of Creation
A Response to the Pretense that No Creation Theory Exists

© 2000 Timothy Wallace. All Rights Reserved.

popular practice among many proponents of evolutionism—including the “regulars” at the Talk.Origins newsgroup—is to claim that “no one has ever presented a scientific theory of creation to us,”[1] without which they find it “impossible to objectively evaluate the idea of creation.” They then hasten to confirm this by “evaluating” the idea of creation—without objectivity! Such an approach to the topic of origins shall be shown below to be unreasonable, prejudiced, less-than-honest, and (therefore) not particularly scientific.
A Theory of Creation
A Response to the Pretense that No Creation Theory Exists

© 2000 Timothy Wallace. All Rights Reserved.

popular practice among many proponents of evolutionism—including the “regulars” at the Talk.Origins newsgroup—is to claim that “no one has ever presented a scientific theory of creation to us,”[1] without which they find it “impossible to objectively evaluate the idea of creation.” They then hasten to confirm this by “evaluating” the idea of creation—without objectivity! Such an approach to the topic of origins shall be shown below to be unreasonable, prejudiced, less-than-honest, and (therefore) not particularly scientific.
http://www.trueorigin.org/creatheory.asp

Answer 7

why not?