We can't decide if we want to ruin our carpets or our lives. What do yall think?
2007-06-27 00:34:08 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Well they both start out cute ....but keep in mind....puppies dont turn into teenagers....
2007-06-27 00:39:04 · answer #1 · answered by Dani 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Buying a puppy is the same as having a new baby. But you can leave the puppy in the house alone. You cant leave a baby. The puppy can ruin your carpets if you let them. But a baby will not ruin your lives only if you let them. A baby is a blessing, you will learn a whole new world. It does change your life. But in the long run they are are blessing from god. If your not ready to make a change in your life then just get a puppy.
2007-06-27 00:49:11 · answer #2 · answered by kink 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The puppy. Trying to conceive is a difficult task (apparently! I'm NOT speaking from experience!!).
Puppies have the ability to walk etc after a few weeks, whereas a baby takes about a year to do that. So - less effort! Puppies are also more fun than kids, but then again, you have to walk them everyday... I guess that beats having to buy all these toys and clothes, though. ;)
2007-06-27 00:39:48 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well if you are serious in this question, I will say don't have the baby or the puppy. Babies, do NOT ruin your life and puppies only ruin your carpet if they are NOT properly house broken. And as such with you NOT knowing this you are not ready and or old enough as well as mature enough to handle either one. Sorry.
2007-06-27 00:38:13 · answer #4 · answered by GRUMPY 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
I would suggest the baby if you are ready for it. I say this because a baby is a lot of work but it's worth all the effort you put in it and all the sleepless nights you are going to have. If you aren't ready to commit to a baby then you should get the puppy.
2007-06-27 00:45:00 · answer #5 · answered by Terry L 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
PUPPY! They are cheaper in the short and long run. Plus eventually, they will stop messing up your carpets.
2007-06-27 01:08:24 · answer #6 · answered by ivan_beals 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think you should go with the puppy, they're less expensive and funnier, besides you should really think of what you have to sacrifice when having a baby "freedom" not to mention many other things such as hanging out late with friends doing stupid thing at bars, ...etc. and again they are very expensive.
and you just might have to change dippers....and so many other things...
and you have to deal with them when they're teenagers.....
bottom line if you have a baby you will be forever hooked up with that baby
2007-06-27 00:46:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Hunter. Baby first,puppy second. The kids gonna need a dog. The dogs gonna need the kid.
2007-06-27 00:44:05 · answer #8 · answered by Michael N 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Baby first,puppy comes next,children grow up best when animals are involved.
2007-06-27 00:39:59 · answer #9 · answered by hunter 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It sounds to me like you and your wife are not ready for a baby or a puppy.
2007-06-27 00:37:43 · answer #10 · answered by barbwire 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Puppies are more affordable yet not durable,
babies are free yet you get the fun as well
its a question about commitment!
2007-06-27 00:39:06 · answer #11 · answered by >D_ConTradictor< 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋