There's something seriously wrong with that woman. EDIT: Did anyone else see the YouTube this morning where Elizabeth Edwards called in during an Ann Coulter interview and asked her to stop making jokes about the Edwards' dead child. Coulter was a total fool--laughing and grinning like an idiot--and interrupted and talked over Elizabeth Edwards the entire time. I mean, for heaven's sake, Mrs. Edwards just asked her to stick to the issues and stop the personal attacks. I think she's mentally ill.
2007-06-27 00:25:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by David M 7
·
7⤊
3⤋
Ann Coulter is the vilest gob of slime ever to ooze its way into a dress. She thrives on kicking people when they're down. Her favorite targets for verbal abuse are grieving widows and bereaved mothers. Given all of that, it should come as no surprise that she lies like a rug when she thinks it will help her party. She has no sense of ethics, and anyone who applauds her tirades has no ethics either.
2007-06-28 17:49:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ConcernedCitizen 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
They found forms of WMD. They found mustard gas shells, and Sarine gas shells. These were a throw back to the Iranian war that Iraq had. The also found evidence that the WMD was moved to Syria, though they found no new WMD. Intel estimates still are saying that they had them and were working on new ones and they haven't changed those estimates to date. As Far as Ann Coulter is concerned, she is a talking head, that gets PAID to be controversial, the same as Rosie O'Donnell or Jon Stewart or Stephen Colbert although their venue is via Comedy or in the guise of a woman's talk about. Why is there no outcry about what Colbert or Stewart say? Back to the old double standard, and do as we say not as we do.
2007-06-27 00:51:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by grinslinger 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
No, Mike, the military did not. Every one of our top commanders in the field in Iraq since the war began has said so. WMDs may have existed in some form in the first Gulf War but not in the 12 years that followed.
Why anyone listens to that Nazi Coulter is a mystery. It's not like she is intelligent or interesting, or has anything positive to add. All she does is rant and dribble on about anything she thinks will get her in the news. She's no different than Al Sharpton.
2007-06-27 00:31:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by psatm 3
·
6⤊
5⤋
USENET posting by Carey Sublette, former analyst with the US Army Chemical Warfare Corps (now the Defense Threat Reduction Agency): https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/al...
2014-10-19 11:03:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Perhaps if everyone stops giving this individual the attention she clearly does not deserve she will go away. Don't pay her comments any mind, don't buy her books, don't watch the shows she appears on... she will fade away if no one pays attention. Everyone above has the right in this country to say what they want regardless of who they offend, but we have the right not to listen. The more attention we give them the more they will spew their brand of offense. It's also less needless stress and fighting amongst ourselves if we ignore them, right?
2007-06-27 05:38:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by D D 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
That woman is a total idiot. She was on Chris Matthews' show last night spilling that dribble. She is so hot for these republicans she would say anything to make them look better. I always wonder why no one says 'Ann where is your proof of this.' She thinks just because she says it, it makes it so. She claims to be so conservative, but always dresses like a slut. I can't believe the republicans haven't canned her a** from the party for those slutty dresses she wears showing all that cleavage...... At the risk of being redundant....she's an idiot.
2007-06-27 00:40:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by zento1110 4
·
4⤊
3⤋
Why do you think we did not? We found everything necessary for chemical weapons deployment, long range missles, etc. All weapons of mass destruction. If you want to slam someone then slam the news for bad reporting of false information.
2007-06-27 00:34:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by bildymooner 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
because they did find evidence that they were moved to Syria and Saddam had help from Russia moving them. You are right Ann Coulter is a weapon of mass destruction against ignorance.
2007-06-27 00:30:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
6⤋
She's vile, hateful and uninformed. She's a legend in her own mind, spews hatred about liberals and religion. She has the freedom in this country to babble nonsense and doesn't realize that groups such as the ACLU would defend her rights if need be because they believe in free speech.
2007-06-27 00:33:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Debra D 7
·
3⤊
3⤋