oh man!
2007-06-26 23:26:07 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
He'll confuse Newark for Iraq and bomb it.
2007-06-26 23:37:32 · answer #1 · answered by Cristiano R 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Things would get messed up. But wait, unclear and nuclear doesn't sound the same, though.
2007-06-27 06:42:56 · answer #2 · answered by John Doe 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He can't even SAY nuclear! I've seen him on the telly going on about 'NUCILAR' ????? Most powerful man on the planet...F ** k help us.
2007-06-27 12:10:25 · answer #3 · answered by Welshdragon 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
three words. more liberal whine as demonstrated here. if you obviously understand the meaning what possible difference could it make. the pelosi reid regime is in power till 08 when this mess is straightened out. you got what you wanted by the 3x needed bush whine...its getting old, grow up and move on.
2007-06-27 06:30:59 · answer #4 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
What would happen if you stopped asking these really stupid Bush questions?
2007-06-27 09:33:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
It could result in the laughter of millions! Or do I mean slaughter?
2007-06-27 06:31:03 · answer #6 · answered by Philip L 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Heyyyyyyy the morning Bush bashers have woke up out of there dope induced stupors, good morning :)
2007-06-27 06:29:15 · answer #7 · answered by Army Retired Guy 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
It's "nuculear", darling. LOL Maybe that will help us.
2007-06-27 06:31:06 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋