No, it wouldn't be plagiarism because if you were to change the definitions, you would probably be changing the meaning. If you really want to be safe, cite the source of the definitions on your paper (i.e., "All definitions come from Webster's Collegiate Dictionary.").
2007-06-26 21:12:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by neniaf 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Be VERY careful. Cite EVERYTHING, even if you change the definition somewhat.
Even paraphrasing is plagiarism if you don't credit your sources.
Thousands of people get booted out of college every year for failing to cite things.
2007-06-28 09:22:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Minh 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
As long as you properly cite all the definitions, then it should be fine. If you truly feel like it, then just re-word some of them to make the definitions more succint and easier to understand. That way, you're not "plagiarizing."
2007-06-26 21:11:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
There are 2 issues I fairly can not STAND appropriate to the hot era: a million: How writing a e book at present seems to be the cool element to do, and each action picture star and their dogs is writing one. a singular, strategies you! Now, i do no longer strategies if it is definitely a severe novel. Celebrities are human beings, too, yet whilst it is a few thing alongside the traces of Snooki's e book, the place all the characters are very of course based entirely on her and her friends, it in simple terms makes me roll my eyes. and of direction, those human beings get printed no situation. So maddening! 2: that's my fairly huge one. E-READERS. i won't have the ability to stand them. every time I see one i want to break it. What do they recommend for the destiny? by way of the time i'm getting my books printed, if that ever happens, will genuine books be out of date? i think of I in simple terms could cry continuously if that happens. those e-readers, to me, are a extensive possibility to the publishing marketplace and to paper books oftentimes. And that makes me offended. i be attentive to they are extra "eco-friendly", yet actually, i do no longer care. maximum books are made with recycled paper now besides. they are by way of no skill a real possibility to our environment! heavily, purchase a real e book. it is not any longer that "inconvenient".
2016-10-19 01:16:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by zaragosa 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on what referencing system your university uses. Mine uses Harvard, and basically, if you say something word for word, you need to reference it there and then after whatever it is.
For example:
"Weatherzone offer premium services for only $5 per month." (Weatherzone 2007)
However, if you are just doing it in your own words, just reference it at the end.
weatherzone (2007) Weatherzone. [online] available www.weatherzone.com.au [accessed 27 June 2007]
For some more information and a great resource for you: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/lasesl/referencing.html#referencing
Hope this helps :)
2007-06-26 21:18:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sammy S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no its not plagerism because thats the point of a dictionary
2007-06-26 21:11:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Breezy_III 2
·
0⤊
0⤋