who's better, manu or tony?

Answer 1

I think Manu is better.

Answer 2

Tony Parker is better than Manu.

Answer 3

If you asked me this question last year or 2 years ago, I would undoubtedly have said Manu. The guy plays with reckless abandon, no fear. He slashes, passes, hits the 3, plays rugged D. I used to think Parker was overrated.
But watching Parker this year, specially in the playoffs, man, I'm a believer. You can't defend this guy! His speed is unbelievable, his penetrations are now even more effective than Manu's, his outside shot has vastly improved. His court leadership for the Spurs was almost perfect.
Now I would say, hands down, Parker over Ginobili.

Answer 4

Parker is more talented and much more explossive. But the reason I perferre Manu is that no matter what happens, he plays like hes been poisoned the winner of the game will get the antidote to save his life. He plays with no regard for his body which will probably knock a couple of years off his career.
Tony on the other hand doesnt bring his A game everyday, doesnt play defense (has gotten better lately though) and at times looks like hed rather be home than be playing. Plus hes a total moron in person

Answer 5

Manu

Answer 6

Tony parker, but if it was in 2005 i would probably say Manu

Answer 7

If you look at their career stats, they are quite similiar. Parker averages more assists and Ginobili slightly averges more rebounds. Thus far Ginobili is a better 3 point shooter. Parker averages 2 more points per game and that is because he averages 3 more shot attempts per game and averages 6 more minutes per game. I will lean towards Ginobili because thus far he is a better jumpshooter, freethrow shooter and a better thief. The topper is at the end of close games the Spurs goto Ginobili instead of Parker or Duncan cause Ginobili is a better freethrow shooter.

Answer 8

Tony for sure.

Answer 9

tony parker

Answer 10

Tony!...cuz his wife Eva is hot!