Iraq? I'm SICK of the hyprocrisy and focusing on the relatively SMALLER issues!!!! Let's focus on THE BORN who can talk and feel and are suffering and dying EN MASSE in Iraq for a war the most Americans agree is WRONG!!!!!!!
http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images/view?back=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.search.yahoo.com%2Fsearch%2Fimages%3Fp%3Ddepleted%2Buranium%26sp%3D1%26fr2%3Dsp-top%26ei%3DUTF-8%26fr2%3Dtab-web%26fr%3Dyfp-t-453%26ei%3DUTF-8%26SpellState%3Dn-742106092_q-tZHbAdcEYMICTguW1vZSoQAAAA%40%40&w=319&h=466&imgurl=www.jesus-is-savior.com%2FEvils%2520in%2520Government%2Fdepleted_uranium_22.JPG&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jesus-is-savior.com%2FEvils%2520in%2520Government%2Fdepleted_uranium.htm&size=25.8kB&name=depleted_uranium_22.JPG&p=depleted+uranium&type=jpeg&no=9&tt=9,168&oid=1fd45cce81f4c4e8&ei=UTF-8
2007-06-26 18:32:18 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
LeAnn, children of Iraqi veterans and troops currently in Iraq are also suffering from the effects of DU and are passing this poison and its effects on to their children. Some of those defored and dead babies are those of american soldiers. Wake up.
2007-06-26 19:03:23 · update #1
Sorry about the typos.
2007-06-26 19:04:16 · update #2
The use of Depleted Uranium should be considered a crime against humanity. The Fact that We have used such weapons should fill us with remorse and shame, and should make us rise in righteous indignation against the leaders of this Nation who have done these atrocities in our names. Until that time finally comes may God have mercy on our souls.
2007-06-26 20:41:10 · answer #1 · answered by The real Ed-Mike 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Why do these chickenhawks answer your question without mentioning your link or depleted uranium?
I promise you, if Iraqis were white, there would be no shock & awe, no execution of Saddam, and no stomach for collateral damage. These right wingers just can't comprehend the fact that people with brown skin are "HUMAN", too.
2007-06-27 03:48:08 · answer #2 · answered by CaesarLives 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
There's really no reason to abort an embryo. As it's not been fertilized, it'll makes it own way out of the woman's body.
I also disagree with this war. The trouble is, Saddam disagreed with me, as do the terrorists in Iraq.
Terrorism won't stop simply if we stop fighting it. If we left tomorrow, that doesn't mean that terrorists will stop blowing up their children in cars.
2007-06-27 01:54:59 · answer #3 · answered by DOOM 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Most of us don't consider embryos to be SMALL issues. ALL adults have a responsibility to act as caretakers of God's smallest creations. Part of that is not viewing them as mere annoyances or, inconveniences or, non-beings.
The US effort in Iraq is likewise at this point designed to protect those who are incapable of protecting themselves. You claim to care about Iraqis so, why aren't you taking their futures into consideration? We are there to take care of those who are under siege from outside influences. We are not there killing the innocents. So, since you care so much about THE BORN, why would you have us come home?
The reason we are there - right or wrong - has no bearing upon our responsibility to aid their country in re-stabilization. One has to think beyond the war's inception in order to draw the proper conclusions. Those Americans who judge the 'war' to be WRONG are failing to do that. They obviously lack the capacity to see the forest around the trees.
2007-06-27 02:31:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
One concern at a time - in Iraq, for instance, we are presently trying to eliminate an ideology of hatred and domination that prides itself on indiscriminately blowing these children you speak of to bits, along with any other innocent people who might be in the immediate area.
I find no hypocrisy in opposing medically sanctioned abortions in this country while at the same time being a proponent of trying to bring stability and security to the people in a pre-invasion hellhole like Iraq.
2007-06-27 01:56:41 · answer #5 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I believe in standing up for all life, especially the life of the innocent.
40 million and counting abortions in the US alone.
That's over 2x the entire population of Iraq.
Think about which one is more important. I mean I hate to put a price on ANY human life. But we need to solve the problems here at home, we just can't ignore them because there are problems somewhere else. We have to pick and choose our battles in this world and prioritize.
2007-06-27 01:38:46 · answer #6 · answered by Nickoo 5 · 4⤊ 6⤋
I would have agreed, on principle, even if I had not looked at those pictures...but those pictures are horrible. How can our government live with themselves, knowing that they are allowing this kind of thing to continue? *sm*
2007-06-27 01:43:59 · answer #7 · answered by LadyZania 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Because they can't utilize that as an issue to raise funds and mobilize the troops.
Besides they're already born they could care less
2007-06-27 01:37:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
Because they were dying before the war and will continue after we leave. What do you think Saddam was doing?
2007-06-27 01:40:50 · answer #9 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Excellent point. The cons are only pro-life when it comes to the unborn, they don't give a crap to what happens to a person after they are born.
2007-06-27 01:39:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 7⤋