The act of negativity through actions of an individual who feels left out of the mix, and feels the need to fulfill oneself by taking what doesn't belong to him.
The thief is one who has the biggest locks on his doors for he feels everyone is not to be trusted such as what he emanates outwardly.
The more he steals, the more he lacks in satisfaction. the satisfaction that is gained by earning it.
They may end up with more material worth than his neighbor, but will never have that satisfying spirit of valuing his own worth. He will become incomplete and lacking the most important values in life- self-worth and self-realizations of great and positive intentions. A withdrawal from the spirit of life, a deep depressing null and void reality will surround him. Even the most beautiful sunsets will be ignored by him, and the utmost uplifting energies of the life force will not be able to penetrate and uplift him for his spirit will be so weakened from its lack of acknowledgments and feedings.
2007-06-27 00:39:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by amberwolf_for_art 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
To claim false ownership and/or possession for selfish
purposes. The definition is loosely defined because
the world, all of its energy and matter, were here before
we were born and it will be here after we have passed
on. Therefore, all ownership should be considered
somewhat tacit, an implied ownership for benefit
and the best interest of continuity of the grand scheme
of the world. In this regard, we are entrusted with the
responsibility of ownership for our life time. How does
this definition fit in with the more common definition
of taking that which does not belong to the taker.
Consider the household and the cook. The household
obtains food and the cook prepares the food. The food
doesn't belong to the cook, but the cook has taken the
food. However, the cook hasn't taken the food for selfish
purpose because the cook is preparing the food for
the mutual convenience of the household.
2007-06-27 02:37:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by active open programming 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A vested interest into something, or a desire, wrongfully actualised by methods of cunning or deceit; that when exposed to the public would bring the wrath of an intermediary authority upon the head of the perpetrator, and the victim would be let go free, fully stressed; but if not exposed, would bring about trouble and pestilence, like sever skin rashes, to the perpetrator, and meaningless loss to the victim who then would curse a lot. Don't do it!!!
2007-06-27 00:05:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Shahid 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hi,
A lack of respect for other people and their belongings/possessions/rights.
Greed: wanting what isn't theirs so powerfully that they have to steal it.
Desperation: and here I see theft in a more forgiving way. If a poor mother steals food for her starving children theft from the pure motive of love cannot be classed surely as a sin.
Indolence: Someone who wants something but can't be bothered to put in the effort to achieve, so steals from another.
Swindle: Someone who refuses to play by acceptable rules.
Polly
2007-06-27 03:19:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by pollyanna 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Cognitive metaphor... each and every thing all of us know is defined by utilising an equivalent and opposite thought. distinctive function, Vice propose, constructive good, undesirable easy, darkish Black, white This "propose between extremes" exists in each and every opposing thought, and easily ties it into one comprehensive. existence is a spectrum of adventure, and not an absolute determination between 2 extremes...the middle way is a thank you to nirvana, oneness, god, stability, team spirit.. we are able to compliment to take the path interior the direction of the grey section between black and white. the middle highway. So definite, the propose lies between the severe opposite ends of human cognitive metaphor.. there lies the way of distinctive function or properly i could somewhat call it stability.. possible continuously be too courageous, or too cowardly, yet possible additionally be a balanced, healthy combination of the two.. which in maximum situations ends up in extra considerate judgements and suited movements.
2016-10-03 05:21:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Assuming what belongs to others without giving them credit for the original thought or creation.
2007-06-26 19:32:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tangerine 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unallowed siezure of property.
2007-06-26 19:56:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Born at an early age 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cunning.
Good luck!
2007-06-27 00:42:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Alex 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thoughtless, not valuing or honoring of another.
.
2007-06-27 04:02:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
act of thieving
2007-06-26 23:55:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋