2007-06-26 16:59:06 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
If it is true it gives stupid a new definition.
2007-06-27 11:30:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, not to be mean but, it's probably better than them having 13 or 14 and giving them the normal first and middle names, they are just looking for attention.
2007-06-27 00:03:14 · answer #2 · answered by barbara b 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that they just can't pick one name so they give the baby all of the names they like. The longer your name the more sophosticated you sound to someone else. At least that's the thinking behind it here in Georgia
2007-06-27 00:02:56 · answer #3 · answered by hotelmajor 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I feel really bad for the child. She will probably grow up all her life being looked at as either: incredibly weird or really cool. And I wouldn't want to be cool just becuase I have 26 names. My name has actual meaning, and I know I wouldn't want it any other way. I would be really upset if my parents decided to name me just for attention.
2007-06-27 00:07:36 · answer #4 · answered by margaretderby 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont know anything about it...but I can see enough from this question! 27 names? That is seriously ridiculous!!! there is not point! I think they should just have more children.
2007-06-27 00:04:24 · answer #5 · answered by Em 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think no more the 4 names and that is including the last....They should cover both grandparents and father....
2007-06-27 00:09:38 · answer #6 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think 27 is too few it should be 48
2007-06-27 00:03:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think that child is going to have an early grave,result of massive confusion.
2007-06-27 00:00:57 · answer #8 · answered by Moanika 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Riduculous! I feel sorry for the poor child!
2007-06-27 00:03:31 · answer #9 · answered by Bren 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think people need to stop trying so hard to be different
2007-06-27 00:02:04 · answer #10 · answered by Mekana 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋