2007-06-26 14:30:23 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
What upsets me is the stupidity displayed by the whole USA, slobbering over shallow, worthless, imbecile drug addict, drunk whores like Penis Hilton and Anna "Fat Pig" Nicole. IQ's put together are -100. But, it's your fault fuking "Gringos" for being such an imbeciles and give them the importance they don't deserve. You Idolize these worthless pieces of ****, and curse the poor labor that put 16 hours a day at substandard wages and conditions, so you can have food at your table, your car clean, your table bused, and your lawn mowed. SHAME ON YOU!!! and you wonder why the rest of the world hates you?
Go ahead take away the fuking points, but that won't erase the truth.
2007-06-26 17:23:51 · answer #1 · answered by cabron o 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes. Michael Moore
2007-06-26 21:38:00 · answer #2 · answered by Suzi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a tough question.
I have no problem with Michael Moore being dumped since he has his own agenda and has proven on numerous occasions to be intellectually dishonest with the facts in the films he makes.
However, I'm sure what he had to say would have been more meaningful than anything coming out of Hilton's mouth. At least Moore has actually worked to gain his celebrity status.
2007-06-27 00:33:30 · answer #3 · answered by TRACY P 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'd rather listen to an hour of Michael Moore. But, news is entertainment and right now P. Hilton is news.
2007-06-26 22:31:01 · answer #4 · answered by jorst 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Anything that includes Paris Hilton should be boycotted, in my opinion.
If he had bumped the Rutgers womens' basketball team, or even the winner of the Golden Gate Special Olympics, I would say he was wrong.
2007-06-26 22:05:55 · answer #5 · answered by nora22000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all, I won't watch either one.
Michael Moore has almost lived out his usefulness. People either love him or hate him and he is to the point of being irrelevant. Unfortunately, he will never influence the public again because he has become an icon of extreme liberalism.
Paris Hilton, on the other hand, is an icon of shallowness, surface beautiful and is completely irrelevant; a blond vacuum. But she's nicer to look at.
2007-06-26 21:57:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nope. I may not think much of Paris, but I CANT STAND Michael Moore. Bet he feels like a loser now.
2007-06-27 11:00:50 · answer #7 · answered by Ewe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why would american be upste that a film maker than shows the truth about the ameican goverment be bumped off by a person who only got her fame because she's rich and bought her way into fame and celeberty status,someone who is such an inccredible role-model for todays morons,good going larry king,you showed the world how you can sellout
2007-06-26 21:35:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
of course! it is time there is a media ban on that girl! she is worthless and I don't get the fascination. Maybe Larry King needs the ratings, and someone who is going to tell it like it is won't bring those in like some internet porn wanna be
2007-06-26 21:41:10 · answer #9 · answered by emack 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I think the whole 'Larry King Show' should be bumped for an entire hour of DEAD AIR.
It would be refreshing.
2007-06-26 21:35:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋