She is the married mother and teacher who was impregnated by her 6th grade student, was sentenced never to see him again, got pregnant by him again, was sent to prison and, then released. When she was released, the two of them married.
I am curious as to what people think about her, her crime and punishment, and her subsequent marriage.
2007-06-26 13:11:37 · 5 answers · asked by Buffy Summers 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
She rightly had to serve the 7 year maximum sentance allowed by law in her State for what she was charged and convicted of. If she were a male teacher that had impregnated a female student under the same circumstance, there would have been more files charges and the sentance would likely have been much longer than what she had to serve.
Yes, she abused her position of authority as a teacher to earn his trust when here was a mere grade schooler and groomed him into what she wanted from whatever she felt was missing from her life and stole his childhood and ruined any chance he had at a normal life. His mother ended up raising him and the two girls. They only end up married after she got out as she had brain washed him at such an early age and manipulated him by having children with him so he really doesn't know any better.
Someday when he finally does grow up and no longer her puppet, she will lose interest and likely look for another prospect; thank God they took away her teaching lisence and she is a registered sex offender so it will be harder for her to make contact with another young man and ruin his life too.
2007-06-26 22:34:23 · answer #1 · answered by bottleblondemama 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Somethings not right that's for sure. I don't think you would have even asked the question if the roles were reversed. A 34 year old male teacher having relations with a 6th grade girl and you know that guy wouldn't have been given a chance. She duped the judge and everyone else the first time around with her statement about needing help...etc. Well, of course she needs help...duh. I don't think it's right that she wasn't treated the same way as a man. After the first incident and very light sentence it should have been a violation of her probation to even be around minor children and once she was caught again with him she should have been sent back.There aren't as many cases in the news about women predators, but when there is society seems to not take it as serious. I don't remember the case or the woman's name but I do remember not that long ago that a female teacher was arrested for an offense and her lawyer made the statement that "she's too pretty to go to jail". WHAT!
I know my thoughts were rambling but I think society is very gender-bias when it comes to these situations.
2007-06-26 13:57:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, she is a sexual predator and should have been classified as one, if she was not. She slept with a 13 year old boy at the time and made him a father 2 times before he was 15 years old.
If a MAN had done this, the population would have asked for him to be locked up for an eternity, castrated and/or drawn and quartered and if he got out of prison be restricted as to where he can live and who he can talk to, where he can work and have his name and face plastered on every sexual predator database known to man.
She was married before when she committed this crime on a child, so her being married to her victim now is not a deterrent.
2007-06-26 13:36:26 · answer #3 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i talk for the ordinary public while i say that i do not know who that's. You ought to consider lovely pathetic for having a query published in POLLS have lower than five solutions, huh.
2016-09-05 09:09:43 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, I think that if her marriage lasts then all is good. I guess.
2007-06-26 13:19:49 · answer #5 · answered by Brenda T 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋