I suggest that when 68% of the American people do not want Amnesty and yet we are getting it ( at least the Senate), that everyone who voted for it lose their next election no matter who is running against them. With a new group of Senators we do the same thing until these guys start representing us. Got to play hardball or they will continue to run our lives as they want!
2007-06-26 10:21:12 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You might be able to throw out 1/3 of the Senate (since that's all that runs in any given year), but you'll never be able to make much of a dent in the House. With gerrymandered districts all over the place, it's more a case of the Politicians get to choose their voters, not the other way around.
2007-06-26 10:25:58 · answer #1 · answered by Chredon 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Do you honestly think the American people have the power, will, or consolidation, (motivation, factual news sources, intelligence, etc....) to make a stand against our current government? I doubt it.
Playing "hardball" is all we can do, and by that I mean we should just be focusing on sports scores, and who's using steroids, because distraction is the only defense we have left against this government.
Seriously, Amnesty? The media's already got us riled up and divided over the poor and desperate streaming across our imaginary political lines while lives are being thrown away in a fictitious war. But, King George wills it so, and so it goes.
Go back to sleep, America. It was just a bad dream.
2007-06-26 12:28:08 · answer #2 · answered by Red H 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only way to regain control of congress is to make them institute campaign reforms. The special interest groups have bought both houses of Congress as well as the executive branch and the people are left with no say in government. Public demonstrations should be planned to stop the madness. Every member of congress that votes for giving this country to the illegals should be recalled by the people and replace with those that acknowledge government if for and by the people not the special interest groups.
2007-06-26 10:34:50 · answer #3 · answered by old codger 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never before have I seen a White House who has consistently ignored the people. Bush is 100% behind Amnesty.
2007-06-26 10:25:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree 100%. People are finally starting to see what exactly what they voted for. Hopefully they will now see the light and start making these people who are supposed to be our voice work for us instead for some big compromise. And before people start accusing just Democrats, they need to see how many Republicans are in favor also. Hopefully it will fail again in the House.
2007-06-26 10:28:17 · answer #5 · answered by David L 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
nicely, enable me positioned it this form. We positioned Saddam into potential...after which years later took him out of potential. This has befell on quite a few events in a good number of alternative international places to boot...and the U.S. isn't the only guy or woman who has finished this. Many greater effective (economically) international places impact the consequences of elections and so forth whether international places the place elections are finished.
2016-12-08 19:29:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. I did not vote for either of my left wing liberal senators. Unfortunately, I live in a dark blue state, and my democrat fellow citizens are off their rockers.
2007-06-26 10:27:08 · answer #7 · answered by regerugged 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree 100%
2007-06-26 10:24:49 · answer #8 · answered by jean 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
I want a return to the Constitution.
2007-06-26 10:27:47 · answer #9 · answered by Mystine G 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
no, I like them just the way they are, I'd like to chance some politicians though.
2007-06-26 10:29:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋