when the US loses in iraq, will the cons blame dems, despite the fact congress gave bush everything he wanted?

Question

of course....its not as though the cons can admit to being idiots

Answer 1

You answered your own question

Answer 2

Well, aren't you the clever little guy, sneaking that bomb in at the end. Gee, you must be proud...

We have only OURSELVES to blame if we lose in Iraq. Period. Not just the politicians, but the American public. Until "We the People" pull our collective heads out of our asses and start paying more attention to national and world affairs than to Paris Hilton and Britney Spears, we get the type of government we deserve.

That being said, if we would drop the idiotic "Rules of Engagement" and meet the enemy on *their* terms, we'd be unstoppable. The "Rules of Engagement" tie the hands of the military.

No, I'm not bloodthirsty or a warmonger, but if we had gone in balls to the wall, I wonder if the civilian casualty count would be much worse than what we are seeing now.

Answer 3

Your statement is typical democrap thinking, vested in only defeat! The other typical democrap thinking is that we haven't already won the war in Iraq and are now fighting terrorist and insurgence. But it is understandable as you and those morons like you are blinded by your stupidity!

Answer 4

No, We will blame you for attempting to cut military funding to bring troops home and then Americans will vote Republican in 2012 because they rushed out of Iraq and will ruin American security

Answer 5

Hold on, we DON'T lose. An acceptable level of violence will be decided and we can then leave with honor and dignity. Wait until the bills start arriving.

Answer 6

ranting liberal, not a question, you just jump for joy wanting your country to lose this war, pathetic...

Answer 7

yes