Clinton's national security adviser confessed to intentionally smuggling classified documents from the National Archives and deliberately destroying them.
2007-06-26 08:53:09 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Time to give it up. You sound like the Dems still whining about the 2000 election.
2007-06-26 08:56:33 · answer #1 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Publicizing the identity of a CIA agent is a felonious act of treason. i'll in no way recover from the ask your self that Cheney had Libby try this. Cheney's day will come. Libby exchange into convicted. Berger is suspected by way of some. If somebody cautioned you 5 yrs. interior the previous that a CIA agent must be outed by way of a political candidate, might you anticipate it may want to be a conservative vp? i think of of deep down, optimum conservatives are quietly bowled over and offended. optimum cons might anticipate a LIBERAL to do some element like that.
2016-10-18 23:55:56 · answer #2 · answered by hyler 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Anyone who tries to smuggle documents out of the National Archives in his pants should do some time. What I'm more interested in, is what did he put in their (the original documents) place?
2007-06-26 09:23:15 · answer #3 · answered by KL15 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Link?
2007-06-26 08:56:42 · answer #4 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
in a just political world individuals would be held accountable yet depending on how the wind blows some walk away and others are absolved of wrong doing
both aisles
Yes, long ago but the punishment did not fit the implications of his crime, FYI above I think Sandy is a he?
2007-06-26 08:59:23 · answer #5 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
last time I checked, he was punished by a court, paid his fine and served his puniishment so this question is old...now we do know that Dick Cheney has publicly admitted not following the law with regards to hiding and obstructing classified material, yet he has not been frog marched yet, must be good to have a DOJ that doesn't believe the VP falls under the law the same way the rest of us do
2007-06-26 09:00:08 · answer #6 · answered by gunkinthedrain 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Do you think Fawn Hall, the one who shredded papers related to Iran-Contra, should be thrown in jail too?
2007-06-26 08:58:19 · answer #7 · answered by ck4829 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I'd like to know why the lib's think he shouldn't be in jail ? Is it OK for them to break the law ? Just wondering.........
2007-06-26 09:06:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What was he covering up and why didn't he want the 9/11 commission to see it?
2007-06-26 09:10:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
ALL criminals belong behind bars,( prove the case,send him away !)
2007-06-26 09:02:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋