No, because he did not commit the same crimes that Saddam did. There really isn't any hard evidence he committed ANY crimes (just a bunch of speculations which won't even get you a cup of coffee).
2007-06-26 07:05:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mutt 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Really?
2007-06-26 14:11:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dave_Stark 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
In April 1991, after Saddam lost control of Kuwait in the Gulf War, he cracked down ruthlessly against several uprisings in the Kurdish north and the Shia south. His forces committed wholesale massacres and other gross human rights violations against both groups similar to the violations mentioned before. Estimates of deaths during that time range from 20,000 to 100,000 for Kurds, and 60,000 to 130,000 for Shi'ites.[
2007-06-26 14:15:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Using chemical weapons against his own people? No, thankfully Bush hasn't gone that far.
2007-06-26 14:10:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Beardog 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Last I checked Bush didn't use chemical attacks against his political opponents or their supporters.
2007-06-26 14:08:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pfo 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
You can't be serious on this.
Did Bush ever use Chemical weapons on a portion of his population?
If yes then indite away.
2007-06-26 14:07:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nickoo 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Stop watching the slanted media, do some research for yourself and start asking intellegent questions.
2007-06-26 14:08:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by JonB 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Interesting concept, good question. I will be watching for everyones point of view.
2007-06-26 14:04:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Janet B 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Certainly, he has committed the "supreme crime"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_crime
2007-06-26 14:07:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ringo G. 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Of course!! He has killed many more than the Iraqi dictator. He is just another nationality.
2007-06-26 14:06:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by PATRICIA MS 6
·
1⤊
4⤋