English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A bike can move uphill without pedling.Any scientific explanation.

2007-06-26 06:39:25 · 6 answers · asked by malonza 1 in Science & Mathematics Earth Sciences & Geology

6 answers

I think there is some trick. Or optical illusion.

2007-06-26 06:42:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They are called "garvity hills" in folklore but not in science. Scientists call them optical illusions.

Other ones are "Magnetic Hill" in New Brunswick, Canada; Burkittsville, Maryland; Polo Magnetico, Dominican Republic; and Ayrshyre, Scotland.

The topography makes an "uphill" seem like a "downhill" to the human eye, but a level will give you the truth. There's no such thing as gravity working opposite!

2007-06-26 06:47:54 · answer #2 · answered by minefinder 7 · 1 0

i could want to take a glance however the relationship hangs. pondering you may no longer replace the suggestions written in, are you able to let us know if the hyperlink continues to be valid? [EDIT] that's available now. i'm going to attempt to offer it a robust examine. thank you for posting the hyperlink. [EDIT 2] quite somewhat, at approximately website 11 my recommendations began to wander as i found out "this is in simple terms no longer as insightful as i theory." I understand this probably is a factor of an exceedingly technical communicate between experts. That Nature has a bent to do in spite of Gravity dictates, curiously the main significant thesis of the author and the question actually on your identify question, basically stops being effortless if we expect of "and how are we going to artwork it out?" the author recommendations-set that we choose no microscopic know-how is objectionable: the macroscopic rules for suitable gases have been profoundly clarified with their kinetic thought (pondering atoms and molecules with velocity). you may gauge by utilising your self my dissatisfaction with the object in 2 questions: one million) Why is the equivalence theory so darned good? No answer to that, because of the fact the author is in simple terms shuffling the equations around to rederive the equations in accordance to which the theory is valid. 2) what's the commencing place of mass? all of us comprehend it is going to have some thing to do with the Higgs mechanism, and gravity must be in there in a roundabout way too. back, the author would not answer that because of the fact from the outset his element is that microscopic component is unimportant. i'm no longer qualified to evaluate the technical components of the artwork nor how groundbreaking that's. To me besides the indisputable fact that it would not fairly make sparkling any of the elementary questions Physics has nonetheless to handle. thank you for sharing the hyperlink, although. [EDIT 3] I could concede i'm slow even whilst hit by utilising a truck. "Why is the equivalence theory so darned good" is a guy made question by utilising commonplace Relativity standards. yet then that's a guy made question already by utilising commonplace Relativity standards. The artwork does positioned forward a particular connection between Gravity and entropy.

2016-10-03 04:18:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You're mistaking the Kenya phenomenon with the less known phenomenon about people on the other side of the world walking around upside down.

2007-06-26 07:43:21 · answer #4 · answered by Jack P 7 · 0 0

There's a few places where this is supposed to happen. But it's an optical illusion.

2007-06-26 07:44:37 · answer #5 · answered by Efnissien 6 · 0 0

It is impossible. It would violate the law of the conservation of energy.

2007-06-26 09:22:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers