He killed his child & wife - they were murdered by HIM and then he killed himself. (Yes, this will come out as just a few networks are reporting this from a reliable source). Come on, why give the guy headlines for doing something so cowardly and just down right horrible.
2007-06-26 02:33:05 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
True, he shouldn't be honored as a great wrestler but shown in the light as the horrible person he really was.
2007-06-26 02:38:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
In all honesty i could like Cesaro, yet he's no longer a draw and youthful followers in no way seem to relish his ordinary profession. Daniel Bryan could be a face yet he's 31 and extra powerful as a heel. Sorry yet i could could exclude McIntyre. WWE isn't a huge fan of ecu wrestlers. It does not count number if Vince gave him the monicker of "the chosen One," because of the fact he in no way lived on the hype. i could dare to declare that William Regal's reign as an IC champ is extra powerful than Drew. i like Seth Rollins wrestling, yet his mic qualifications are no longer useful to make him a mega-celeb. In opposite, Ambrose has great mic qualifications yet he does not have the seems. Cody Rhodes is probable the terrific candidate because of the fact he proved that he's not any longer in basic terms a son of a WWE Legend. He have been given his own enigmatic gimmick, replaced his topic, have been given his own outfits, extra strikes, communities with Sandow and huge mic qualifications for a guy with a lisp. i'm hoping Cody Rhodes win the WHC next 3 hundred and sixty 5 days.
2016-10-18 22:38:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because people will read it. Good news never makes headlines, because no one cares to read it. That's the media and their audience today. Bad news makes headlines because bad news sells.
Besides, it may shed some light on who he really was, or who he became in the last few days of his life. Maybe some of his fans will stop worshipping him as a hero when they learn about his last few actions in life. IF he did it.
But perhaps we - and the media - should wait before labeling him a murderer. There is no conclusive evidence. No gun, no knife. No marks on anyone, from what I've heard so far. Perhaps it was a triple homicide, not a homicide/suicide like everyone believes.
But back to the media. No one ever wants to read about someone doing well, or doing better than they are. Tabloid magazines are so popular because they chronicle the harsh side of fame, trying to catch beloved stars at their worst so the more ordinary among us can feel better about our situation in life.
2007-06-26 02:40:40 · answer #3 · answered by Ryan H. 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think people are shocked right now and trying to grapple with this situation.
I'll bet he was suffering from severe mental illness. I am certainly not excusing what he did. I am just stating my opinion on his condition. His wife and child are the real victims here.
It will be interesting to see what news comes out as the day goes on.
2007-06-26 02:37:43 · answer #4 · answered by searching_please 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
He MAY have done something cowardly and horrible. But I think we should reserve judgment until we know more about what happened. It is still a terrible tragedy, regardless of whether he killed them, or they were all killed by someone else.
2007-06-26 02:36:56 · answer #5 · answered by Tony M 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Anyone not think 'roid rage is real. This is why the autopsies. They will probably find he was juiced up.
It is sad the way the WWE requires that these people sacrifice their minds and bodies so the McMahons can be rich.
2007-06-26 02:41:42 · answer #6 · answered by sad_state_of_affairs 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I just got hooked onto this story today.
I recently read it is just now being investigated as a homicide, not homicide-suicide.
We'll see the turn out though.
This world is crazy. =(
Update: Nevermind! Haha. Just read another article saying he did it. Lord, news broadcasters need to make up their minds!!
2007-06-26 02:39:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
News is news, whether Bad or Good.
Letting the viewers know what happened is fine but don't broadcast it for months on end.....
I also think that they focus way too much on the bad news then the good news..... but honestly, there's not much good out there anymore.... people are going nuts !!!!
2007-06-26 02:39:32 · answer #8 · answered by M.O. 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's more interesting than listening about floods, and Gordon Brown becoming the Prime Minister.
2007-06-26 02:37:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually according to news stations there was no bullets or guns in the house or bullet holes in bodies and no force entry and no strangle marks on the bodies. I have no clue what had happened
2007-06-26 02:38:35 · answer #10 · answered by chi_cubs_lover 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋