A recent Newsweek poll said over 40% of people in the US believe Saddam was behind 9/11. Who r these people?

Question

and 1 out of 5 say that Iraqis were thhe hijackers.

Answer 1

Obviously people who don't pay attention or care.

Answer 2

They are lazy thinkers, the EXACT kind of people Cheney and Klan count on to not analyze anything they see or hear on Fox Noise. If Rush Limbaugh told them Bush and Cheney had set bombs in the Towers and trained the hijackers personally, they would bust down the doors to the White House and lynch the criminals within (if Rush told them to, that is), with no proof or evidence. But thats ok, we dont have Habeas Corpus in this country anymore so bust away...

These are the same people who couldn't locate Iraq on a map if they were parachuting into it. The ones who, if you ask them who started the American Civil War, answer, "Bill Clinton". The ones who want to deny Welfare to a single mom with 3 kids, but have no problem giving billions to Big Oil.

Only good news is, only about 2% of that 40% can find their way to the polls on Election Day, so at least we dont have 3 million write-n votes for Barney the Purple Dinosaur (just a couple hundred thousand)

Answer 3

enable me in simple terms commence by way of asserting that the 1st answer is misguided. Gore and Kerry weren't past to Bush interior the polls on the evaluate their respective elections. in certainty bush became way past to Gore interior the polls till October of 2000. As for the newsweek poll, i think of that obama's lead in it is style of better than the place the race definitely is yet i do believe obama is forward by way of an substantial margin none the less. Is it 15 factors? probable no longer however the traditional seems to be a pair of 6.5-7 factor lead. in basic terms time will tell if Newsweek's attitude became properly suited. in this actual pollthey sampled "registered electorate" as a exchange of "possibly electorate". there's a bonus and draw back to that. remember pollsters classify human beings as "possibly electorate" in the event that they have voted in presidential elections before. If new voter prove is low this 3 hundred and sixty 5 days, then the polls that instruct obama head by way of 5 or 6 or 7 are probable extra precise. in spite of the undeniable fact that, if new voter prove is extreme, which many warning indicators instruct that it is going to likely be, then Newsweek is probable extra precise, considering they are additionally catching people who're possibly to vote this 3 hundred and sixty 5 days yet do no longer qualify as "possibly electorate" because of the fact this could be their first election the place they voted. returned we are able to in basic terms be attentive to after election day which pollsters have been properly suited yet remember, interior the primaries there have been many states the place Clinton and Obama have been polling neck and neck yet obama ended up winning by way of 20 or 25 factors. that's as a results of the fact new electorate, no longer the common democratic ordinary goers weren't being polled yet they became out overwhelmingly for obama. If Obama's marketing campaign maintains that enthusiasm into election day, anticipate new voter become extreme and anticipate the polls to below signify obama's help. If new electorate lose interest in obama, then anticipate the polls that pattern "possibly electorate" to be a different approximation of the place the race is heading. So which way is it going? Who is accustomed to. in case you think of latest voter turnout would be extreme, hear to Newsweek. in case you think of the comparable previous human beings would be popping out and fairly everyone else will stay living house, seem at Rasmussen, Gallup, NBC.

Answer 4

Sure they did. They can't think for themselves.

And they listened to Bush too much. We still get people on here who say Iraq had something to do with 9/11!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjFrezxIMAQ

Answer 5

I would suggest that these would be people who support the present war, and look for justification. They are also likely to be people who do not read newspapers or watch responsible news programs...they merely listen to like minded people and repeat the crap they hear from unreliable sources...

Answer 6

..and 14% of Americans still have confidence in the Democrat-controlled Congress.

Who knows who these people are..

Answer 7

What do you expect. It is a pool from newsweak. That is why it is known as "NEWS WEAK" because it is a left wing political publication.

Answer 8

the people are just stupid just to be nice about it the don't know anything !!!!!

Answer 9

Dumdass yanks as Usuals.......need i say more?