She appeared to have good intentions once upon a time.
Everyone should see the Movie!
2007-06-26 08:02:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ringo G. 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes, and she will be President with Obama as Vice President come 08. I saw the movie Sicko and it slams the Republicans. In the theater everyone clapped and whistled, go Micheal Moore. It is great!!!
Boy the propagandist troll went to great lengths to spam this question. I think the answers to this page from the propagandist troll may be a record. Yahoo Katie would love to get a e-mail over this one.
2007-06-26 03:37:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Eddie 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Thirteen years later, Clinton is more for the corporate agenda now than you may think. It's significant that Obama already has a health care plan out, but Hillary still does not. Nonetheless, she'd do something about the health care mess, while most if not all of the Republican candidates would remain laissez faire.
Clinton Cautions on Health Care Reform (AP article) http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2007/06/25/800453-clinton-cautious-on-health-care-reform
2007-06-26 01:58:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
No, she doesn't "deserve" the presidency, especially after her dictatorial Hillarycare fiasco back when she was "co-president".
And if you think corporations are not supportive of nationalized health care, think again. The US automakers have been grumbling about their medical insurance costs for years, hoping to shift that burden to the US taxpayer.
I'll take my chances with corporations over the corruption, inefficiency and coercive power of government. Especially when such a program is so blatantly UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
2007-06-26 02:14:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
First, try to get your info from more than one source, especially if that source is Michael Moore, everyone knows he has a socialist agenda that he has been pushing for years. Secondly, do you really want the government telling which doctor you can see and when? So to answer your question HELL NO Hillary shouldn't be president because of her attempted health care work.
2007-06-26 01:55:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
What as stupid post. Hillary and her health care work, WHAT Health care work, are you just posting this garbage to get people to react ? because you can not possibly actually believe this, its not possible that anyone with a brain can believe it.
Hillary does not deserve even to be a senator let alone a president.
What is shocking is that people like you actually have a vote.
2007-06-26 02:17:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Her health care work should be the biggest red flag not to vote for her. Do you really want the government to tell you how long to wait for an emergency surgery and hope they even o.k. it? Government involvment in healthcare is the biggest problem driving up cost. Give it to the free market and the prices will drop drastically. Hillary is just trying to get more people dependent on her so she can continue to gain voters. She care nothing about you, just about gaining votes.
2007-06-26 02:12:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Pro-American 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
roflmao
Michael Moore hasn't made an honest film depicting the actual facts in his entire life.
***
As for corporations -- let us get this straight -- your standard of living and the widespread Internet itself which lets you ask these 'questions' are products of the corporations continuing attempts to create and sell products that people really want.
So if you're serious about wanting corporations to disappear, can we assume that you'll cease using their tools of oppression such as this forum and disappear from these questions forever??
I thought not.
another hypocrite. They're very common these days.
(soupir)
2007-06-26 01:57:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Spock (rhp) 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
I thought you were leaving for England......You're not gone yet???
Yeah, let's copy the Socialist healthcare network of UK.
""It is absolutely disgusting that people with serious conditions are being forced to wait for operations, whilst minor conditions are dealt with in an attempt to meet government targets."
Dr Evan Harris, for the Liberal Democrats, said waiting time targets were a "blunt instrument".
"Where there are maximum waiting time targets there will be an inevitable distortion of clinical priorities.
"There has to be an end to political interference with clinical decisions."
OOHHH, "political" interference in Health care????
2007-06-26 02:37:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cookies Anyone? 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
If people don't vote for someone that will uphold our constitution this time, America will be just another one time great nation. Who will secure the border? Who will uphold our Constitution? Who will enforce our laws? Who will take the troops out of a civil war?
2007-06-26 01:57:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by jackie 6
·
2⤊
2⤋