On 9/11 tragedy struck but towers were standing.What/who brought 'em down?Wheres Osama,anthraxer.why war?

Answer 1

Blah blah Spam...

Blah Blah Diffrent silly name...

Blah Blah Osama...

Blah Blah 9/11...

Get a new record this one is broken.

Answer 2

Wow, it's like we live in a police state now! You ask a question and you get persecuted! George Bush and the government have you just were they want you!
People that never want to face the facts or at least seek truth most always do what the folks above have done, which is attack you personally or instantly say you are wrong knowing they have done no research to back their argument.

Did everybody all of a sudden forget that Larry Silverstein admitted they blew up(We decided to pull it) WTC 7!
"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329&q=trade+center+7&pl=true

How come Thermate was found on WTC material?
Based on chemical analysis of WTC structural steel residue, a Brigham Young University physics professor has identified the material as Thermate. Thermate is the controlled demolition explosive thermite plus sulfur. Sulfur cases the thermite to burn hotter, cutting steel quickly and leaving trails of yellow colored residue.

Prof. Steven Jones, who conducted his PhD research at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and post-doctoral research at Cornell University and the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility, has analyised materials from WTC and has detected the existence of thermate, used for "cutting" the steel support columns, as evident in the photo below.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4884818450327382904
p.s. Please don't say this is fake. This is a PhD scientist of over 30 years.

People really seem to be dumbed down and living in their own idiocracy.

Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.

Answer 3

Ahhhhhh The consiparacy.

Read "debunking 9/11 debunking"

Answer 4

Wow, good questions...

I'm guessing it was Carl Rove who PERSONALLY wired the 8.5 tons of explosives necessary to bring down the towers.

Cheney was on the remote controlled miniature planes that they used to dupe the MSM into thinking they were real airliners.

Condi Rice is in charge of the prison camp where all of the 3500 supposedly "dead" victims have to be kept in perpetuity.

And of course Bush is at the white house, trying on his crown as the New dictator of the North American Union

Why, it all makes sense now...


/sarc off

Answer 5

what other urban legends do you hold as historical fact?

go over to YouTube and find some more terror-apologist
efforts..maybe you can check Michael Moores site too..
I hear they give out jelly doughnuts

Answer 6

GROSS FACTUAL INACCURACIES AND YELLOW JOURNALISM

1) Why did the BBC use a thoroughly debunked graphic animation from PBS' Nova show to illustrate the collapse of the twin towers? This graphic portrays the tower collapsing at a rate of ten floors every six seconds. For this to be accurate, the tower's 110 floors would have taken 66 seconds to completely collapse. In reality, the towers collapsed in just 14-16 seconds at the extreme end of the estimation. The graphic also erroneously depicts the floors collapsing without resistance, which could not have happened if the building's collapse came as a result of fire damage alone. Furthermore, the thoroughly debunked "pancake theory" holds that the core column remained upright and static as the animation shows when in reality the entirety of the towers, including the concrete support structures, were pulverized into small pieces and dust. A video explanation of the erroneous Nova animation is included below. Does producer Guy Smith consider using an animation that portrays a tower collapsing in 66 seconds an accurate reflection of how the twin towers collapsed? Will producer Guy Smith retract this error before his show is aired again? Will the BBC announce a retraction of this error as is common practice for proven factual inaccuracies carried in BBC programming?

Yahoo, censored my original link but here is another:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaZLgEnka8w

2) Why did the program claim that debris from Flight 93 having been found 8 miles from the crash scene was a factual error on behalf of 9/11 skeptics? Both the FBI and the NTSB admitted that mail the plane was carrying had been found 8 miles from the crash scene. Pittsburgh Tribune Review: Crash debris found 8 miles away.

3) Why did the program claim that the collapse of Building 7 resulted in no casualties without mentioning the statements of both an eyewitness at the scene and Congressman Otter who both publicly stated that Secret Service Agent Craig Miller died as a result of the collapse?

4) Why was footage filmed at ground zero on 9/11 of a firefighter discussing the damage to Building 7's sprinkler system used to support the notion that fires caused the building to collapse while footage and testimony attesting to the notion that Building 7 was deliberately brought down, that firefighters had been warned in advance that it was going to be brought down, and that bombs had brought the building down, uniformly ignored? Why was the testimony of Craig Bartmer, a former NYPD official who states he heard bombs tear down Building 7 as it collapsed , omitted from the final edit? Why were the dozens and dozens of references to bombs exploding at all levels of the twin towers including the basement areas made by ground zero rescue workers and firefighters, caught both on camera and tape recorded from the firefighter's communication radios, omitted from the final edit? Why was there no effort made to include the testimony of William Rodruigez, who was a witness to underground explosions in the basement levels?

5) Why during brief coverage of the Building 7 issue were the words of Larry Silverstein, the owner of the WTC complex who told a September 2002 PBS documentary that he and firefighting chiefs decided to "pull" the building, not even mentioned? Why were the hundreds of millions of dollars Silverstein made from the collapse of this building alone not mentioned as a plausible motive for its demolition?

6) Why was coverage of the collapse of the twin towers and Building 7 narrowed into a mere debunking of the "squib" issue and testimony from the dozens at the scene who both saw and heard explosions completely omitted. In debunking the squib issue, why did the documentary fail to point out the fact that such emissions could be seen exiting the towers many floors below the collapse point?

7) Why were the numerous unprecedented wargames that were conducted on 9/11 dismissed as "routine" when they were anything but? Though the show admitted that such wargames slowed down the response to the hijacked airliners, they refused to ask who was in control of the wargames and refused to mention the fact that some of these wargames involved planes crashing into high profile buildings and the huge improbability of such a coincidence occurring.

Answer 7

It's all a conspiracy. George Bush brought them down. No plane hit the pentagon either.

Answer 8

You have not been paying attention.