English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

both are 1.6l..nid to know which 1 is better in term of fuel economy,maintenance wise,durability for the long term..help me out on tis guys...thnks..

2007-06-25 23:43:13 · 5 answers · asked by thE oNe n 1 in Cars & Transportation Car Makes Mitsubishi

5 answers

Good luck I was never impressed with the impreza and haven't been run thru by a lancer. In America 2.5 liter 2.4 liter engined Suburau WRX STI and Lancer EVO 9 Both boy racer or ricer cars with spoiler diffussers wings turbochargers that just beg the owners to change someting and void the warranty. I almost never see any old Imprezas Or Lancers why is that? You just have to ask your self do I look good in this car can I afford the insurance and car payment.

2007-06-26 00:47:53 · answer #1 · answered by John Paul 7 · 0 0

neither go for the big boy version and hit up the evo lancer or the sti impreza... but if you want just the reg. the go for the ru its awd and has better low end

2007-06-26 12:16:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ok well i had 3 friends that blew there engine of there wrx sti
have not heard of any big issues ppl have w/ there evo's
if you want to get someone fast go w/ the evo
but if you want to drive some where slower w/ better handling take the wrx sti
have fun w/ the choice you make xD

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4809213163804466107&q=evo+vs+sti&total=366&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=3

2007-06-29 20:20:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

lancer better car all round fuel maintenance and resale

2007-06-26 06:59:55 · answer #4 · answered by David T 3 · 0 0

i dont reallyknowmuch about the differences on fuel and stuff but you should go 4 the scooby- it has that lovely loud sound that gives me goose bumps :)

2007-06-26 06:47:42 · answer #5 · answered by sammy_baby_j 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers