Iraq will obviously haunt him, but I think Britain is just about a better place. Certainly his actions in Northern Ireland are something for him to be very proud off.
2007-06-25 23:29:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
history will checklist (with sturdy reason) Blair to be the worst best minister Britain has ever had. Blair's management is administered as all communist occasion leaders run their events: ''as a dictatorship'' and this is will what would be remembered maximum. His intervention in Iraq, is the biggest mistake any best minister has ever made and 3 million voters went onto the streets to tell him so. He destroyed inner maximum pension schemes and has left hundreds with out provision for his or her outdated age, the NHS is in a worse situation than it grow to be two decades in the past with hundreds of hospitals closed via New Labour and that they have got at present made a blunder via telling out authentic lies in regards to the state of the provider(large mistake individuals that use the hospitals understand in any different case). Blair is in worry for fraud and his element kick (Prescott) is getting away with homicide. The British public do not have confidence Blair in any layout simply by fact he's a shown liar and which would be what he's prevalent for. of path the widow of Kelly ( you recognize the guy Blair at a loss for words to devote suicide) will in all probability curse Blair and his dodgy dealings and documents. To sum up Blair would be prevalent simply by fact the epitome of evil and be remembered for a million Iraqi deaths (in all probability so lots greater whilst this conflict ends) the guy is in basic terms the Pitts and what else would nicely be suggested for this form of total loser
2016-12-08 19:02:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will be sad to see him go. He has done so much for this country and we dont even know it.
And why are people targeting him for the war in Iraq? The decision is not made by him alone, it has to be passed by the house of lords and then the queen. She is the one that says yes to the war not him. If anyone is to blame here for the war its the queen, unless everyone is forgetting but she does run this country and a decision to go to war comes from the queen and the queen alone.
I dont think ppl realise what misery Gordon Brown will bring to this country, hes another John Major a boring old man who does in fact look like hes a tory.
I intend to give my vote to Plaid Cymru, I was all for labour but now it is to be governed by Gordon Brown Im not backing them.
I would ask ppl to remember what Tony Blair has done for this country before they judge him, at the end of the day he is doing his job and if it wasnt for his policies that made ppl vote for him we would still be under tory government.
2007-06-26 03:33:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by hornybunny 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'll be glad to see the back of him, as I think most people will. However, that doesn't mean that I think Gordon Brown will do much better. I mean look at the mess hes made with the publics money, you think hes gonna do a better job as PM. I think not!
2007-06-26 02:37:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by GayAtheist 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally I've always like Blair, if not all of his decisions. Going into the war in Iraq with no-brains Bush was a bad call. But there isn't anyone else out there I'd rather see as PM. I'm not too fond of Gordon Brown.
2007-06-26 00:51:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by ivy_la_sangrienta 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
I loved to listen to the guy; probably because of the sharp contrast between his ability to communicate and the ability (or lack thereof) or our own President Bush.
His support and friendship with President Bush always intrigued me. I always felt it was a real feather in Bush's cap in a funny way.
I am sorry to see him go, but since I'm an American I don't guess my opinion matters so much. I'm interested to see so much negativity toward him, from posters whom I assume are English. I hadn't realized he was so unpopular.
I have a sense that he may be glad to go, though. He looks tired!
2007-06-26 02:18:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by zeldaohzelda 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Tony Blair has possibly been a more destructive PM than Thatcher - to even be close is some achievement. He has dragged the reputation of politicians lower than ever. He is a pathological liar, a megalomaniac who ignored fellow party members, his cabinet and the public. He has lied UK forces into illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq which have resulted in the deaths of over half a million civilians. He has made the UK the US's lapdog. Yes, I'm sorry to see him go - free, rather than to a trial in The Hague for war crimes.
2007-06-25 23:14:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
He's a lying, cheating weasel, as are all politicians these days, but he is the "leet" weasel.
It seems sick to me that he might be made a "Peace Envoy" to the Middle East, given it was partly his actions that have turned that area into the war-torn bloodbath.
Slimey phuxor. Good riddance. Looks like a phucking toad.
2007-06-26 03:14:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by BushRaider69 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Im not a Tony supporter, but for what its worth I do think hes done a better job than Gordon Brown will!
2007-06-25 23:10:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Good he is going, that man has done so much damage to England. Shame we are getting Mr McBrown though, he's bound to carry on Scottish prejudice against the English.
2007-06-26 01:05:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋