someone is taking the p**s. Shouldn't he be arrested for war crimes? He is responsible for the death of thousands in the middle east, how the hell can he be considered as a "peace" envoy. God help us all, i despair, i really despair, what filth we have running this world.
2007-06-25 22:13:11 · 11 answers · asked by Bob N 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
haha! bliair once and ever bliar again and so on. mind if he does do his thing ( for personal glory?) bit of luck someone will shoot the useless fellow and we may in time never have to listen or see clap trap from him again. he wrecked this country i was so proud of, need i go on?
2007-06-27 04:03:32 · answer #1 · answered by ellie knows 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He will be arrested for war crimes, though Bush did most of them!
Another one of Bush's nit-wit ideas!
Tony Blair as envoy to the middle east is the same as making Pete Rose the envoy of the Baseball Hall of Fame!
2007-06-25 22:21:42 · answer #2 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, yes.
This is a Bush appointment, more or less. Bush seems to make high level appointments for two basic reasons: 1. to undermine an agency that Bush wants to undermine or eliminate (e.g. the UN, the environmental protection agency) or 2. to reward his usually incompetent friends. Bush may want Blair as an envoy to inflame things further, so that he can justify a war on Iran. I like to think, however, that Bush is merely trying to reward Blair for his loyal service.
I think Blair means well. My belief is that he can't imagine a life without political power, so he jumped at this opportunity to try to straighten out the middle east. He's smart enough to do a good job, if he can free himself from his leash.
2007-06-25 22:19:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Tony Blair should be arrested for war crimes, Bush Should be arrested too, Blair is just a follower, Bush is the leader of such war crimes, don't you think so?.
2007-06-25 22:17:13 · answer #4 · answered by victor_ng_kl_usa 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think of Blair is somewhat incorrect for the placement. he's despised a lot interior the middle East that the cost of his very own secure practices could be approximately he comparable because of the fact the Palestinian budget. i easily doubt if he will come out of this one smiling... if he comes out in any respect.
2016-10-03 03:51:46 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
your right he is the wrong man.he plans to become all religious, and try to unite the religions in peace an idea which he nicked from this site (probably) which was put forward by me some time back,but he is a fake christian the muslums are anti sodomite, and blair is anti family and pro sodomite. i dont think the muslums will entertain him, i think they know a fake when they see one, he seems more to me like an anti god infiltrator into religion, his cause is a one world order, with one leader,which means the whole world has to be conquered by tyrants like him.
2007-06-25 22:37:13 · answer #6 · answered by trucker 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
WTF? I was thinking this too. How can he be some kind of envoy to the Middle East. but then again bush spinned the war as for "freedom" so why not for peace
2007-06-25 22:18:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When I first heard this I thought it would be similar to putting a paedophile in charge of an infant school - madness.
2007-06-25 22:19:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think this has more to do with making sure TB's pay packet doesn't drop to much when he stops being prime minister.
2007-06-26 00:13:43 · answer #9 · answered by John D 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
George Orwell was right.
2007-06-25 23:10:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋