I personally think he was not guilty. He said he didn't do it and if he did he would be lieing. By the way I am white and I just think he wasn't even involved of killing his wife. Why would a great actor and a great ex Buffalo Bills running back would do it. He's more innocent if anything so he did not do it.
2007-06-25 16:38:04 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I was hoping that they would find someone else did it ,but being in that white bronco with a friend $5,000 and a gun , if he was not guilty why did he run, I'm sorry i think i am the type of person if i did that , i would go directly to the police department and turned myself in, whats the use of running .
2007-06-25 16:47:19 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He was found innocent based on the presentation of evidence at the first trial. However, he was found guilty at the 2nd trial and was fined and had to pay both families restitution and he was denied custody of his children based on this judgement.
He is a greater actor than you will ever know with a known abuse problem toward his victim. Most spouse abusers appear to be great guys to others...it's when they are in private with the one they love too much that they snap.
My answer...he is and was proven guilty, saddly he walks the planet. The next question should be "will he do it again?" The answer "No! she's dead, he can't do it again" It is a plethra of legal loopholes that has enabled he and many others like him to escape justice.
By the way, what rock have you been hiding under...this is an ancient discussion.
2007-06-25 16:57:49 · answer #2 · answered by fuzzbutt 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I personally think he is as guilty as sin. Who else would have been motivated to commit such a Hannis crime? And if he is so "innocent", then why has there not been any further investigations into who really did it?
Just cuz' you are an actor, or a great running back does not excuse you from having real human emotions, like jealousy, or the feeling that ..'I wanna kill someone.'
2007-06-25 16:47:33 · answer #3 · answered by dewhatulike 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
the final consensus is responsible. The jury did no longer get the entire tale. case in point, the Bronco chase became no longer suggested by way of the prosecution. what's spooky is that the ordinary public DID get the entire tale yet a number of them cheered and threw events interior the line celebrating his "innocence!" It does not get any below that. What an insult to the relatives.
2016-10-18 21:48:38 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think OJ was guilty as charged. But, His fame and wealth won him the acquittal. Now, if a poor John Doe off the street without a dime to his name was in OJ's shoes. I'm sure the poor man always loses the fight and gets to go to prison.
I guess when you got alot of money and can afford top notch attorneys fighting for ya. it makes a big difference how much cash you got and how far you will go with the cash resources and legal recorses you can get.
It's all about the money !!!
2007-06-25 17:23:15 · answer #5 · answered by J 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
A few years ago I played cards once in a while with a lady who was an attorney's secretary involved in the case (she can remain anoymous as there were many). She knew for a FACT he was the murderer. However, the bumbling of a few police and prosecuters and Ito rendered him "not guilty"...almost justifiably with the government mishandling of the investigation and prosecution.
The defense attorneys just did their job.
2007-06-25 17:09:37 · answer #6 · answered by Bill 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know if he was guilty or not, but the circus that the prosecution put on was a complete farce, and had reasonable doubt all over the place
2007-06-25 16:47:02 · answer #7 · answered by Greg 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Remember - he was found both Innocent AND Guilty of the same crime...
God bless the American legal system ;););)
2007-06-25 17:07:32 · answer #8 · answered by kr_toronto 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Its too late to even think of Orange Juice
when we are thinking of landing
on the Mars, lol
2007-06-25 16:41:56 · answer #9 · answered by azrim h 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
he WAS guitly..in my Interview and Interrogation class,we used the transcript of his first "interview" with detectives as a training tool on how not to interrogate someone and he confessed 4 times,he had a bag with the knife he used,a Navy SEALS fighting knife with him in the interview room but they let him get out with it and he gave it to his atty who never gave it up....those two clowns were so enamored with him they screwed it all up...hes gulity as sin....they blew it...
2007-06-25 16:45:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋