Michael Moore....?

He is an amazing master of the documentary. People hate him, but that's a great honor. He was the first to expose the exploits of the big 3 automakers in "Roger & Me"... and of course, most of modern America came to know him in farrenheit 911.

What a great country where people like Moore are allowed to do what they do best.... rake the muck, open the eyes of the closed...and hopefully, create awareness of real issues that affect all of us in some capacity.

2007-06-25 15:53:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋

He's like the school bully who thinks he's smarter than every one else just because he's meaner than everyone else ..only a LOT more dangerous . Apparently there are those on the left who things people only listen to Hollywood and fiction ..so they stoop to a new level to attract votes , while the manipulation tightens like a noose ..and many are scooped right in never knowing what lies ahead ..I hear many( but certainly not all) of those who become Moore's target-children , are just that ..impressionable kids . Al Gore made a propaganda film and Hollywood added the glitter . Even Hillary Clinton is getting in on the ACTS with her Sopranos spoof . I think the whole thing is scandalous because these same leading democrats in the party want to shut down alternative views on talk radio . It's a dangerous thing when all you get is one opinion .I think Michael Moore is very dangerous ..but he fools many with his "movies"..

2007-06-25 16:01:21 · answer #2 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋

Michael Moor is a misfit, like many extreme left are.
Sycho is an adjective that goes well on him. He let himself to be duped in Cuba. Anyone from there knows that high medicine in Cuba is available for the Elite and for people with dollars or if there is some propaganda value they give it for free.
The Cubans don't get any modern prescriptions, have to bring food, towels, sheets, soap, shampoo etc if hospitalized.
Doctors can only prescripe 1950's era medicines for the Cuban people they have lists they have to follow or else....

2007-06-25 15:54:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋

While he makes some very valid and controversial points, I'm not too keen on his film-making ethics. Watching "Bowling for Columbine" I got turned off his methods when he was trying to interview Charleton Heston. While I am not a fan of Mr. Heston, that was out and out harrassment and misleading his interviewee. I'm no NRA advocate, believe me. I'm also no supporter of public humiliation either. As a responsible fim-maker it necessary to show a modicum of tact and respect. I saw none in that particular cut.

2007-06-25 16:00:31 · answer #4 · answered by OP 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋

This question is just asking for hostility. I think Michael Moore shows things to be legitimately concerned about but he presents it in a bad way.

2007-06-25 15:51:19 · answer #5 · answered by neve_freak2001 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋

Michael Moore is a big, fat, bloated, useless, greasy, media-pandering, sensationalistic, opportunistic, self-aggrandizing, hack.

2007-06-26 10:30:15 · answer #6 · answered by badkitty1969 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋

You mean 'Jabba the Hat?' He has some nerve making money off the blood of the heroes of 911! That fat bastard should be locked away in a room until he is forced to waych his own crappy films and eat himself! (But I'm not bitter)

2007-06-25 15:52:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋

In in the middle. He does bring out the real truth but he does it in such a negative way that it questions his work. He lies to get the truth basically

2007-06-25 15:52:53 · answer #8 · answered by Par 4 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋

Some of things he says are true, others completely blown out of proportion. But I think he abuses freedom of speech.

2007-06-25 15:51:49 · answer #9 · answered by blah 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋

Not sure, his movies start off good but I get bored towards the middle.

2007-06-25 15:51:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋

36 answers