Once the smoke clears, and the next president is elected (whoever that unfortunate sap might be) and there is a complete accounting of the mess that they have made of the country and the normally illegal measures they under took during their watch. It will become clear that if any 2 deserved to be impeached, they will rocket to the top of the list.
2007-06-26 03:41:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
I choose it have been achievable. Bush/Cheney have surely made a multitude of united statesa.. international opinion is purely beginning as much as get better now because of desire in the imminent election. Obama or Hillary could surely enhance our status and impression between something of the international (in spite of the undeniable fact that it rather is controversial how powerful the two could be). McCain would have a helpful consequence besides yet i'm much less particular of that. It relies upon if something of the international sees McCain as a Bush clone or not. Bush/Cheney have 1000's of legal experts working for them so i could see it as next to impossible to cost them with a criminal offense in the subsequent 6 months. except they are hiding some thing enormously unlawful it is without notice made public. The gutless Democratic congress will not be able to squeeze expenditures by way of with no Bush veto so they won't have adequate help to objective an impeachment. distinctly because Bush/Cheney have not been charged with a criminal offense. permit's await the subsequent president and desire the present you may depart without doing too plenty greater injury.
2016-11-07 10:59:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Long overdue. You have to look at the bigger picture... If we don't impeach at this point our very democracy is at stake in the future. Not to mention how the world will perceive us after this administration leaves office. Impeachable crimes you ask? Not matter what your political agenda...this is a must read article (listed in sources below).
2007-06-28 04:37:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely, but the Republicans in the Senate wont allow it to happen. They have been stonewalling ever since last Novembers elections. We can put Bush and Cheney up on indictment charges though after they leave office in 08. This will be even better for America.
2007-06-26 01:18:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by leonard bruce 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
It's a little late in the game for impeachment for either of these two. By the time it could be accomplished it would be almost time for a new President & Vice President to take office! I'm afraid we will just have to ride it out.
2007-06-25 14:37:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by geegee 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
Hell yeah
Misusing his power & authority
Treason....afterall, he did fly the Bin Ladens, his oil buddies, out of the country after September 11th. The Bin Ladens and Bushes families are old oil business partners.
Housing someone wanted by the U.S Government......he knows where Bin Laden is. He thought he was fooling America by switching the search to Sadam. For all we know, Bin Laden and Bush just needed Sadam out of the way so they could get the oil
Murder....for sending the troops over there to get killed so he could carry out his illegal agenda
2007-06-25 15:15:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yes. Go to these websites to look up his criminal activities and do something about it.
http://impeachforpeace.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movement_to_impeach_George_W._Bush
2007-06-25 15:23:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
yes, yes
geegee, it's never too late. An impeachment would keep them both busy and out of trouble.
2007-06-25 14:38:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
High crimes and misdemeanors are the only reason to impeach a president, none of the things you mentioned are either
2007-06-25 14:39:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Insane 5
·
0⤊
5⤋
Do you know what impeachment is?
You can't impeach someone because you don't like them. If that were the case, then all presidents would have a 2 month term, and would have to get reelected all the time. (Also, all of those problems have been around since before bush...)
2007-06-25 14:35:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by scaponig 3
·
4⤊
9⤋