R people really that blind or stupid that they believe G.W.BUSH is a good President?

Answer 1

sad but true

Answer 2

Not necessarily, many people for one reason or other always vote the Party ticket. Doesn't seem to matter who but what the Party says. At one time this kept things in balance, since we now have so many and no choices at the same time, not so much anymore. How can you tell who is telling the truth when John Kerrys wonderful contribution to his Country was torn asunder by a total phoney and phoney information. We as a people need to speak with each other, not so much at each other. I know people who were so disgusted , at the last election, they stayed home because they believed Old Dubya didn't have a chance. I guess he's the second President never legally voted into office by the people. Hmmm The other one was Ford....oh yeah....spiro....Tricky Dicky....Viet Nam....the more things change the more they stay the same?

Answer 3

After they view this verified, defactualized data they won't believe anything any Nazi Bush member says or does! Enjoy.

History vs. Religions.....winner History
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=928518742089256264&hl=en-old one

ZEITGEIST, The Movie - Official Release ... “SPIRIT OF THE TIME”
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5547481422995115331

ZEITGEIST, The Movie - Full Production (must see)
http://www.everythingburns.com/wordpress/?p=65

http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/

The World is a Stage – Part 2
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7160790539111319889

Answer 4

I think Bush a far better president than Clinton or any Dem that has run against him. If you want to check out blindness or stupid, look in the mirror. A person who doesn't see or know the truth.

Answer 5

people want to believe and respect the president who ever he is, that said. only about a third of the people think he is a good president or about 75-85% of conservatives/republicans which now find themselves as accessories after the fact.

Answer 6

probably not but he still is.

For Gods sake you were ready to impeach Clinton for having it off with his willing female staff. But you won't go after Bush for dragging you into a world war.which it really is since you have many "allied forces" against the "AXIS powers". same exact terminology.

different scale maybe but new type of warfare.

Answer 7

Yes
Apparently you CAN fool some of the people all of the time.
About 19% .
The NeanderCons who don't believe in Evolution because they missed out on it.

Answer 8

At Least They Didn't Mean Well....

Peter MehlmanWed Jun 20, 10:07 PM ET

Boy, America has had a lot of shitty presidents. Just take a stroll down repressed memory land and look at that police line-up from November 22, 1963 through January 1992. Ford may come out looking the best of the bunch and he was widely acknowledged to be unable to walk and chew gum. (Wisely, his advisors encouraged him to sit while chewing).

And really, Clinton could have been a lot better too.

So now we're six and a half years into Bush and everyone from Helen Thomas on down is declaring him the worst president ever. What no one is saying is the one overarching reason he's the worst: the Bush administration is the first that doesn't even mean well.

With the possible exception of immigration reform -- and who knows what grotesque financial incentive underlies that -- try to pinpoint even one policy motivated by the desire to lessen human suffering, to improve the life of citizens. Nothing. There is nothing.

As much as Democrats loathed Nixon, there was no denying he had some noble goals. He tried for universal health care and... I'm pretty sure there were other things.

As much as Republicans loathed Clinton, they had to know he cared about people. Amazing how his "I feel your pain" quality became such a disdainful joke. That sounds like a good quality in a president.

Even with the low poll numbers, liberals still feel stymied in conveying just how bad this administration is. It's been the ultimate frustration to consider the people who don't see Bush's malevolence: In 2004, rural America cited national security as their number one reason for voting for Bush. But people in the major cities, where there's actually a chance of being victimized by terrorism, people voted against Bush. Frustrating. In the cities, where most people are utterly at two with nature, people cited Bush's raping of the environment as a major reason to vote against him. In rural America, where people fish and hunt and generally do things outside, they voted for Bush. Sooooo frustrating. On Sutton Place and in Harvard-Westlake, where kids go to college after high school, they vote against Bush. In rural America, from where the majority of tragically killed kids in Iraq soldiers come, they vote for Bush.

You could argue that even the world's worst fascist dictators at least meant well. They honestly thought were doing good things for their countries by suppressing blacks/eliminating Jews/eradicating free enterprise/repressing individual thought/killing off rivals/invading neighbors, etc. Only the Saudi royal family is driven by the same motives as Bush, but they were already entrenched. Bush set a new precedent. He came into office with the attitude of "I'm so tired of the public good. What about my good? What about my rich friends' good?"

How can anyone not see it? It's not that their policies have been misguided or haven't played out right. They. Don't. Even. Mean. Well.

Answer 9

Republicrats and Demlicans are both falling to new lows, and the American people have allowed it to go on to long. There's a storm coming, keep your eye on the ball.

Answer 10

I think his approval rating shows that most people do not beleive he is a good president.

Answer 11

the best in the past 14 years