The guy gassed hundreds of kurds for no real reason other than pure hatred.
Nuff said.
2007-06-24 21:51:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
0⤋
The Masonic media hide American reports from 1989 that Iran is responsible for killing the Kurds. After 9/11 Sunni Islam became the primer enemy, not Shia Islam who was, after the Iranian revolution 1979.
2007-06-25 06:39:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Unjust is killing innocent men, women, and children.
Unlike enlightened countries where criminals are 'rehabilitated' and released to 'err' again (and again...usw), or given probation, or housed and fed for their entire lives, ...
the Iraqi justice system will insure that this swine will not hurt people again - not ever - period.
To the libs:
> best deterrent out there - guaranteed
> no recidivism - guaranteed
> yes, there are always type I errors (false positives) BUT there are also type II errors (false negatives) - which error can you live with in the real world where people want to kill your family whether you're nice or not??
2007-06-25 06:17:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by xxpat 1 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Democrats will be flying the flag at half staff at DNC Hdqts. the day he hangs to honor one of their fallen heroes. In San Fransisco their will be street protest with people wearing Free Chemical Ali buttons on their Che T shirts the night before he swings.
PS: Chemical Ali is the poster boy for WMD and he used them.
2007-06-25 05:28:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by WhyAreYouaREMF 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Whoopy frickin dooo! It took to long. But they should gas him not hang him. And the defense team for OJ said if the glove don't fit you must aquit. Ali's attorney should have said it was gas from Saddams ass I don't fart like that.
2007-06-25 04:54:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The guy didn't steal cookies out of mommies cookie jar. He killed thousands of innocent people for the shear amusement of it. Who know's how many he helped torture just so he could get off.
If you ask me hanging him is too nice!
2007-06-25 05:02:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by bigdaddy33 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Since I was not a member of the court - and so did not see all the evidence presented by both sides I do not think I am really in a position to judge either way.
2007-06-25 04:56:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sageandscholar 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
I think they can do with him as they wish. He contributed to the death of many and now, it is his turn to join his cousin in the afterlife.
2007-06-25 04:58:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think the verdict is good.
He's a war criminal and he deserves it.
2007-06-25 05:01:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
EH,who may have supplied SADDAM with wmd during the IRAQ Iran war ? I don't think the sentence was unjust but.....
lets just say Santa's helpers got away !!!( Now their making toy's for the children of IRAQ(ho ho ho)
2007-06-25 04:56:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by dadacoolone 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
JUstice served and unlilke here it will be swift!
2007-06-25 05:08:03
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋