explain
2007-06-24 19:22:21 · 6 answers · asked by juggsthenaut 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Other - Visual Arts
Piet Mondriaan who worked with a more contempory or modern art.. his paintings were very simple.. but percise. There wasnt a lot of brush strokes.. he didnt paint trees and boats of scenery.. but his work was beautiful. So well placed and thought out. (Neo-Plasticism is the type of art he worked with to be specific...) Its the type of art i'd have displayed in my home if i lived in a loft in new york! ;)
but to answer your question simply.. i think less is more.. I get lossed in paintings that have too much to them..
2007-06-24 19:34:57 · answer #1 · answered by Brittany Danielle 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Sometimes the simplicity of the shot is what makes it beautiful. Also adding to many details may take away the beauty of the shot.
2007-06-24 19:31:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did... yet i discover the comparable issues in it as Miami Ink. Theres far too a lot drama. each tattoo seems to have some undesirable long-winded 'which potential' to it. such as you could not purely get a tattoo reason you pick to. It must be because of the fact your horses grandma died or something.. and that i merely don't experience like it portrays tattoo shops very realistically, y'be attentive to? And Kat Von D annoys me. Shes particularly, yet I desire she'd close up :) I do like tattoos however.
2016-09-28 10:17:02 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. beauty is in the eye of the beholder. **** looks good to flys.not much detail in that. unless ya ate corn
2007-06-24 19:27:34 · answer #4 · answered by GoodFella 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most certainly. Simplicity is the essence of elegance. Isn't that beautiful?
2007-06-24 19:29:38 · answer #5 · answered by Jeanne B 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure. Think of all those abstract paintings you see. Many of those aren't very detailed at all. They may be colorful, but their abstraction is what makes them unique.
2007-06-24 19:37:51 · answer #6 · answered by Who Knows??? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋