Hi, is it true that in San Francisco after a owner-move-in eviction, the property shall NEVER be rented out , regardless of how long ago it was evicted, or even after it's being sold to a third party?
My story : I've used owner-move-in as a reason to evit a tenant 4 years ago (i beleive the laws require the owner to stay there for 36 months). Recently, I've come across articles saying that unit shall never be rented out, not by myself, nor can be done so even after sold to a 3rd party? is this true?
Thanks
2007-06-24 16:24:12 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance ➔ Renting & Real Estate
according to http://www.sftu.org/omi.html you seem to be ok.
the laws do seem to be more strict now, If you end up re-renting the place in the first three years you can't raise rent and the the previous tenants get first right of refusal.
2007-06-24 17:01:45 · answer #1 · answered by npwinder 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It does not appear to be true. From what I could ascertain from the provided URL, anyway. Read it for yourself. It's certainly complex !
2007-06-24 23:50:52 · answer #2 · answered by acermill 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No idea, they just banned drinking water, so my guess is yes.
2007-06-24 23:42:07 · answer #3 · answered by blibityblabity 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋