Yes
2007-06-24 12:43:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jackie Oh! 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is clearer that Sirhan Sirhan and James Earl Ray acted on their own, but the case involving Lee Harvey Oswald is not as clear. What makes me really suspicious about Oswald is the fact he was assassinated by Jack Ruby, someone who died a few months later also.
There are too many loose ends in the JFK assassination to conclusively say Oswald was a lone actor.
2007-06-24 12:48:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Stylish One 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course they didn't. I read and heard a bunch of stuff, but James Earl Ray I am not sure of. Oswald could not a fired a bullet that went on a roller coaster ride, and I also think that it is very strange that within 3 weeks of JFK's assassination, about 50 people directly related to the case "died", and a doctor from Parkland where JKF was rushed to, said that the pictures of JFK's head were ot like he remembered them, and the body seemed to have more damage on it. For Sirhan and there have been various witness reports of a woman in a polka-dot dress and a man running ou tof the building through the fire escape saying "We killed Kennedy" or something like that over and over again.
2007-06-24 12:49:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by danae 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No,Oswald and Sirhan thought they were alone, but there was a back-up gunman for each, that only the true people behind the assassinations knew about. The back-ups were the ones that shot the fatal shots.I do believe James Earl Ray acted alone.
2007-06-24 12:46:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Louie O 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Lee Harvey Oswald - No
Sirhan Sirhan - Yes
James Earl Ray - I haven't made up my mind yet.
2007-06-24 12:11:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by kepjr100 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sirhan and Earl..acted alone..but given Nixon was alive and in power I don't know anymore..
I have read some pretty compelling info just in the last week
that ties Nixon to the JFK assassination.
I have always dismissed conspiracy..from a scientific perspective..no proof..no latitude
but the time line on the following site is really hard not to
study.
the author:
.Don Fulsom covered the Nixon White House for United Press International. He has written about Nixon for The Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, Esquire, Los Angeles, and Regardie's.
http://crimemagazine.com/03/richardnixon,1014.htm
the timeline at the very end is amazing and sourced..there are only two entries that are subjective.
2007-06-24 13:10:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well if you mean pulled the trigger.. its pretty sure that Sirhan Sirhan and James Earl Ray did the deed. One was caught on film and the other only used a single shot.
Kennedy's death will likely NEVER be put to rest unless other documents come to light or an aging assissin steps up in his final moments (al la 'deepthroat' from the Watergate issue).
.
2007-06-24 12:14:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by ca_surveyor 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I dont understand if he acted by myself, yet I do have faith heavily that the therory of a conspiracy is a lot larger then maximum individuals understand. some years in the past i take place to be out in Touscan Arizona and there's a plane museum there and the final prop pushed air fore one is there. jointly as i grow to be taking a excursion, the instruction manual went into the assasination and stated something that have been given my interest. whilst Kennedy went to Dallas, they took the prop plane. whether the hot Jet Air tension One grow to be being readied to deliver to dallas to change it and can be the delivery for something of the holiday. whilst Kennedy grow to be killed Johnson grow to be waiting on the hot Air tension One to bypass to Dallas. Very outstanding that he may well be waiting as though he knew. ok all that appears like accident,,, untill i began out finding on the politics of the time. 1960: Bay of Pigs fiasco. The Joit Chiefs and the CIA lead a invasion of Cuba to get rid of Castro and fail depressing. 1961-sixty two: Cuban Missile disaster: The Soviet Union places nuclear missiles on Cuba ninety miles off the Florida Coast. The Joint Chiefs see this as a raffle to redeem themselves from the catastrophe the 12 months earlier. Kennedy whether isn't a militia president and refuses to bypass alongside with their plans. 1962-sixty 3: Vietnam: Vietnam is heating up. Joint Chiefs prefer to deliver troops there to help the disaster. Kennedy refuses returned to deliver troops. whether this time there is somebody who does love the militia and could help the Joint Chiefs if he's president. Nov twenty 2nd: Kennedy is killed and Johnson (a definite sir guy) takes presidency and quickly troops are sent to Vietnam under the administration of the Joint Chiefs, the President, and a minimum of two different adult males (badely lead conflict). Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald: Who those 2 adult males are is largely a wager. i might in all probability say that the Joint Chiefs and Johnson necessary somebody that grow to be a no physique. somebody that should get the activity finished, and with any luck dissapear. A foriegner grow to be suited. They contract Oswald to kill Kennedy (and probably somebody else helped), yet he have been given careless after the assasination. i think of the conspiracy additionally blanketed the CIA. whilst Oswald is arrested, the CIA, the Joint Chiefs, and Johnson understand they have a severe project. He knows who gave him the orders. He can factor the finger authentic on the white domicile. So he ought to be silenced earlier he can In steps Jack Ruby. besides it ought to all be hogwash whether all of it is clever.
2016-12-08 18:05:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes because you can't trust anyone and so far no one has come out to say they knew these individuals were up to something. If anybody knew someone would have talked
2007-06-24 12:33:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Wise Guy 1
·
0⤊
1⤋