I've read a lot of his stuff. It is interesting but I wonder how far-fetched it really is. Is anyone a reader of his that knows if his stuff is accurate after researching it yourself?
2007-06-24 11:43:19 · 4 answers · asked by tatereatinmic 3 in Social Science ➔ Anthropology
His writings are very accurate: on Tamagochi's and Pikachu and other childrens cartoons he is spot on. His fictive writings convey a wonderful sense of the laughability of unqualified cretins commenting on scientific and archaeological matters
2007-06-24 13:57:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even if he's not 100% accurate, i.e. He sometimes stretches the truth a bit, at least it sells books...
Accuracy can be a little boring!
2007-06-25 04:59:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Pretty bad
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Hancock
anybody who uses "unquestioning" in connection with mass media and scientists is off on the wrong foot right away.
2007-06-25 09:16:32 · answer #3 · answered by Mike1942f 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Its great for starting fires, lining bird cages......etc.
2007-06-25 12:55:34 · answer #4 · answered by dmackey89 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋