2007-06-24 08:45:44 · 12 answers · asked by sgarrison77 1 in Sports ➔ Baseball
If not, do you think it should be?
2007-06-24 09:06:09 · update #1
no
2007-06-24 08:48:00 · answer #1 · answered by Bryan P 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, it's only an ejection. Sub will resume the at bat (and assume the count).
This need not be an automatic out. The offending team is penalized by the ejection.
2007-06-24 09:57:33 · answer #2 · answered by br549 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the at bat continues as demonstrated with Paul Lo Duca last night at the Mets game
2007-06-24 08:59:29 · answer #3 · answered by Tommy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm torn between Barry Bonds and Pete Rose. If i ought to sparkling Bonds then i may well be at peace with all the information he owns. Then there is Rose on the different hand and he's the best-ever hit king and he's not interior the HOF. i'm unable to %. between the two adult males.
2016-12-08 17:58:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No...a new batter bats with the same count.
2007-06-24 08:56:09 · answer #5 · answered by suicidal_kitty23 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
strikes yes
or not then they send a player to complete the at bat
rare
2007-06-24 08:49:07 · answer #6 · answered by Michael M 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. He is replaced for a pinch batter.
2007-06-24 09:01:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no they replace him and that batter takes the count
2007-06-24 09:00:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it is not an out. Why should it be?
2007-06-24 11:20:57 · answer #9 · answered by Ryan R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO !!!!!
They replace the batter with another.
2007-06-24 08:49:04 · answer #10 · answered by Old Dawg 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, someone pinch hits for him
2007-06-24 13:02:38 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋