She tried to take the easy road of lazy perceived patriotism, and is now trying to get herself untangled from its many grievous errors. It's hard when a president with 90% approval (unearned though it was) decides on a course of action and declares that anyone who so much as hesitates to go along with it is on the side of the enemy.
I had a few testy conversations back then with the staff of my US Senator, who repeatedly assured me that the war in Iraq was the correct course, and that the Senator was privy to information that I wasn't, and that it would all come out eventually, and I should just be patient.
Needless to say, that Senator is now regretting her vote to authorize force against Iraq, and her staff won't discuss what might have gone wrong back in '03....
I'd like to see Obama get the nomination, with Wesley Clark as his running mate.
I can dream, can't I?
2007-06-24 08:56:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by oimwoomwio 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Again you right wing whack jobs bend,twist, and warp the information to fit your agenda, just like Little Georgie Boy and Shooter Chaney did to get us in the mess we're in.
2007-06-24 16:11:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by old man 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a really good article on Hillary Clinton and Iraq.
2007-06-24 15:49:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush lied to her. And her Hubby must have lied to her as well. She can't take responsibility for a decision she let others make for her. She is just a naive woman who let men tell her what she should do. At least that is what she seems to want people to believe.
2007-06-24 15:48:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by wallyshields 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
since there is no failed blunder the answer is no. al qaeda is not attacking on us soil and the kurds who were being ethicly cleansed until saddam was stopped are still alive. once again a liberal in need of a fact checker...yawn...well at least you admit the possiblity of you hallucinating..remember your words not mine.
2007-06-24 16:24:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
In her defense she was fed the same falsified "intelligence" we were, but your right still she supports the war and should never get into the white house.
2007-06-24 15:47:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ringo G. 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yup, I remember that! She was only doing it so she could "prepare" to get elected.
When I think of her, the words "hypocrite", "sneaky", and "Back-stabber" come to mind.
2007-06-24 15:47:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Emily 2
·
1⤊
1⤋