more economical to release the movies on disc to the theaters and they play it through a projector? Also film reels are such ancient technology, they've been around since the late 1800's. What about high definition and the quality of a digital video, that is not possible on a reel? Or am I wrong about the quality, I know reel films are pictures or frames that are played very fast, maybe the quality of each picture is comparable to digital pictures, especially with the modern equipment they are recorded with these days.
I know the theaters pay alot for the movies, averaging about 50-60% of the ticket sales, so I wonder if production companies want to keep producing the films on reel, because it's easier to justify charging thousands of dollars for a reel, rather than a digital disc, that anyone can buy for $20 in about 9 months.
Old films on reel are considered works of art these days, I doubt a DVD released only to theaters would ever be considered art.
Just wondering.
2007-06-24
08:19:48
·
7 answers
·
asked by
♥Tawnya♥
4
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Movies
Thanks much guys for sharing your knowledge on the subject, very interesting.
If Droopydog comes back he may be interested to know I never used the word 'buy" as he seems to think I did because he put it in quotation marks. I thought there was probably some sort of leasing or renting, that's why I said they "pay" around 50-60% of ticket sales, if they are buying it, how would they know in advance what to pay, as in 50-60% of what? The only reason I feel I want to address this is because when someone seems like they are correcting you and puts a word in quotes, as if you said it, I can't resist letting them know, I need not be corrected on this one. Thank you anyway though.
2007-06-24
09:25:28 ·
update #1