You know, we all ask, answer and learn here in this particular forum, and I've even asked my own Q's in areas that needed to be asked. A couple weeks ago, this mamamia person got all tight in the pants about who's voting for who. I got fasely accused along with a whole bunch of other people. It was always my impression that we, regardless of little titles by our icons or where we place in mamamia's sacred top ten listing, which I don't place there btw lmfao, that we should be here to assist legitimate questions asked by other hobbiest's.
Ok so someone don't want to take my advice. I should get all blibber blathered because the asker couldn't pick out one for themselves? I should go and look and find out who got picked? Why should that make a difference to me? Are my fish going to die because they don't want to use my input? Well mamamia seems to really give a **** here. So I think so they can go to sleep at night, let's put them in charge of yahoo voting? What you think?
2007-06-24
08:13:05
·
5 answers
·
asked by
I am Legend
7
in
Pets
➔ Fish
I also think that mamamia is really another contributer on here. I don't know who, but it seems when some answer they voted for didn't win, they feel it's ok to make accusations against someone. I think this shows real lack of character and judgement. I'd really respect mamamia a little more if they'd just simply ask thier question on whatever thier main account here on yahoo is. I find it too hard to believe that someone who just votes really gets a stinky diaper over this stuff, and they aren't having thier best interests in mind, or thier little clique, whoever thier favorites are. So if this will stop all the bs, do you all think we should put mamamia in charge of the voting in yahoo so we can all focus our time on more important things??
2007-06-24
08:16:52 ·
update #1
BTW mamamia, I forgive you for fasely accusing me of **** two weeks ago, and if you do need legitamate help with your fish care, I'll help you the best I can, but you don't get my vote here. You clearly do not have objectivity. I'm not slinging mud at Mantra, but I saw your link in your Q, and if you were being objective, following your line of logic, why didn't you accuse Mantra of cheating as well? If 51 votes make cheating, and 46 doesn't, you don't seem to be very objective, so I can't give you my vote to be head of the committee.
2007-06-24
08:31:30 ·
update #2