English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Foreign Policy of an imbecile,
The Foreign Policy of someone who doesn't understand world dynamics,
The Foreign Policy that uses terrorism as a mantra for hate,

An uninformed Foreign Policy.

2007-06-24 07:02:28 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

kev l
"do you have proof of this or just spouting propaganda "

Kev's apparently been asleep the past 7 years...he needs filling in.

Humanist, isn't it your job to keep Kev up on current events.

" The earth rotates around the sun ?? You got any proof of this or just spouting propaganda"

2007-06-24 07:33:25 · answer #1 · answered by Peace Warrior 4 · 3 2

If you are honestly, and I mean honestly, interested in what Bush's foreign policy has accomplished, you should read this article.

http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20070301faessay86203/daniel-w-drezner/the-new-new-world-order.html


Here's a snippet

Given its performance over the last six years, one would not expect the Bush administration to handle this challenge terribly well. After all, its unilateralist impulses, on vivid display in the Iraq war, have become a lightning rod for criticism of U.S. foreign policy. But the Iraq controversy has overshadowed a more pragmatic and multilateral component of the Bush administration's grand strategy: Washington's attempt to reconfigure U.S. foreign policy and international institutions in order to account for shifts in the global distribution of power. The Bush administration has been reallocating the resources of the executive branch to focus on emerging powers. In an attempt to ensure that these countries buy into the core tenets of the U.S.-created world order, Washington has tried to bolster their profiles in forums ranging from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to the World Health Organization, on issues as diverse as nuclear proliferation, monetary relations, and the environment. Because these efforts have focused more on so-called low politics than on the global war on terrorism, they have flown under the radar of many observers. But in fact, George W. Bush has revived George H. W. Bush's call for a "new world order" -- by creating, in effect, a new new world order.

This unheralded effort is well intentioned and well advised. It is, however, running into two major roadblocks. The first is that empowering countries on the rise means disempowering countries on the wane. Accordingly, some members of the European Union have been less than enthusiastic about aspects of the United States' strategy. To be sure, the EU has made its own bilateral accommodations and has been happy to cooperate with emerging countries in response to American unilateralism. But European states have been less willing to reduce their overrepresentation in multilateral institutions. The second problem, which is of the Bush administration's own making, stems from Washington's reputation for unilateralism. Because the U.S. government is viewed as having undercut many global governance structures in recent years, any effort by this administration to rewrite the rules of the global game is naturally seen as yet another attempt by Washington to escape the constraints of international law. A coalition of the skeptical, which includes states such as Argentina, Nigeria, and Pakistan, will make it difficult for the United States to engineer the orderly inclusion of India and China in the concert of great powers.

2007-06-24 14:10:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I can see that Bush is working for the Saudi Government. Enforcing their Foreign Policy.

How's that Darfur thing going . Are those indigenous people cleared off the drill sight yet.

Go Team Bush Go

2007-06-24 14:13:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

I see that the redneck, myopic, xenophobic, evangelical moronic voting imbeciles of America are more to blame than a certifiable half wit 'president'

America deserves EVERYTHING it is deserving of, from its current and previous governments foreign policies.

2007-06-24 14:12:15 · answer #4 · answered by Devil's Advocate 3 · 4 2

Did you know that because we went to Iraq Russia hates us more then they did before we went to war. They are the only country's either Germany and Poland do too because Bush wanted to set a nuclear test center in both country's and they got mad because they do not want to create a nuclear war by doing so.

2007-06-24 14:07:51 · answer #5 · answered by Hidden Track 6 · 2 2

It's not just Bush. The foreign policy of every President starting with WIlson has played a part in creating the chaos of today.

Ron Paul 2008.

2007-06-24 14:05:29 · answer #6 · answered by AngelaTC 6 · 9 5

Yes, but having won 2 elections (sort of), it is also a popular foreign policy. Bush told the American public what they wanted to hear.

2007-06-24 14:06:06 · answer #7 · answered by neil k 3 · 5 5

most of the american population is ignorant to the rest of the world and only care about themselves.
they have a gay relationship to isreal,because they are much like americans.
there time will come soon, and the americans will pay dearly for there neanderthalism

2007-06-24 14:09:17 · answer #8 · answered by cheechandchong1979 2 · 3 2

Agreed.

2007-06-24 14:12:40 · answer #9 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 3 3

Do not be ridiculous and angry about your inability to see the truth ....................militants and insurgents in the world need to be wiped out and driven out of their hiding to make this planet safe for peace loving people like us in US. The focus right now is in the areas where population is predominantly Muslims but this is only because most terrorists are Muslims. And I for one believe writings in Quraan encourage terrorism.

2007-06-24 14:08:03 · answer #10 · answered by fatandsmooth 5 · 1 6

fedest.com, questions and answers