I have seen lots of questions on Ric Fliar and Booker, be it King Booker, or Booker T.
In my opinion, you just can not compair these two. Booker may have held more titles, but he has not achieved the legendary statues like Flair has. Give the man about ten more years, and then he can be compaired to Flair. like i said, thats my opinion.
So, in your opinion, and i will not choose a best answer my self, i will let this go to vote, because I am a Flair fan, Who is better and why you think he is better, Flair or Booker?
Wrestling is Cool
2007-06-24 02:18:51 · 16 answers · asked by Bugs Bunny 6 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
I think Ric Flair comes second to Hulk Hogan in achievements, so not to be compared to King Booker.
In the past, the nature boy would be the worst in fair play, but now King Booker with the help of his queen would be the worst.
2007-06-30 05:30:54 · answer #1 · answered by Laila 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
10, 20, 30 years from now Flair will still be better. Booker never makes anybody look really good in the ring. What Booker T match is your favorite? Do you even have one? Off the top of my head I can name at least 6 Ric Flair matches that are classics. Whats the best Booker T promo? Is there one? Can you think of a Ric Flair one? I'm sure you can.
I'm not trying to dog Booker T but I mean really. Ric Flair has wrestled everybody from 60s,70s,80s, 90s, and today. Its not fair to Booker T to try and compare.
2007-06-24 10:43:08 · answer #2 · answered by Mr.Know It All 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ric Flair all the way! Yes Booker T held a lot of titles but that was with the WCW, and now that he is back after his injury, he has gotten annoying to me. King Booker or not, he sucks! I love Ric Flair!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOO!
2007-06-29 18:22:20 · answer #3 · answered by Jilly 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Flair. Hands down. Booker has not held more titles. Flair is a 16, and I repeat, 16-time world champion. Booker was good when he was Booker T but now he sucks.
2007-06-24 11:07:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ric Flair is WAY better. Over the years, he has gained and lost more adoring fans than anyone in the business. Sure, he hasn't had as many titles as some of the other wrestlers, but the history he has made is worth way more for the wrestling business than some stupid title, isn't it?
2007-07-02 08:47:10 · answer #5 · answered by NONAME 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Ric Flair is better , he has way better mic skills , even though the WWE won't give him any time anymore , also he is a better technical wrestler . He has the figure 4 leg lock , and Booker's got nothing at all .
2007-07-01 11:56:57 · answer #6 · answered by Street Knowledge 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ric Flair, with out a doubt. Booker is good, but not comparable to Flair :)
2007-06-25 18:21:25 · answer #7 · answered by FarmerCec 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
King Booker is one of my fav all-time, a superbe wrestler, I mean look at all those titles he won, being world heavyweight champion, 3 time United States champion,he has had numerous titles regin with a tag team partner (RVD,Test,Goldust). Heck he has even been hardcore champion. Don't get me started about WCW. But there is NO comparision to the "Nature Boy" Ric Flair WOOOOOOOOOO let me say this once and once only. 16 time WWE/WWF champion. And has been in so many memorible matches and storylines that its impossible to forget the Nature Boy
2007-06-24 09:45:42 · answer #8 · answered by Lights Out #3 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
although king booker ha been 5 time 5 time 5 time 5 time 5 time wcw champ no one can ever get to where ric flair is cause he is 16 time world heavyweight champion woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
2007-07-02 06:41:29 · answer #9 · answered by dpcrusher7 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ric flair all the way because he was a 16 time champion and if it wasnt for him there wouldnt be a four houseman or evolution group and king booker is only a 5 time wcw champion
2007-06-24 17:58:47 · answer #10 · answered by Ace 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋