My opinion is yes, i.e. The Kuma Sutra. It is just words that arouse us. Like any good story.
Unfortunately some people are not mature enough to see it that way and some use it to hurt other people.
2007-06-24 01:32:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by izzie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not generally, as the definition of pornography in law includes "no redeeming social value," or words to that effect. But some great literature has been considered pornography, as I am sure you know. And balanced precariously on the fence between these two are the works of the Marquis de Sade.
2007-06-24 08:31:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by auntb93 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe if there was an article that followed. There can be some really nice structures of words, that would no doubt be considered literature, but just happens to be sexual and/or pornographic.
2007-06-24 08:29:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by V 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are passages in works of fiction that some might consider them as porn. But the content and the intention of the writer usually gives them a different value.
2007-06-24 08:52:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it all depends on the difference between oral s.ex and salad dressing.
Do you know the difference?
If not, would you liek to join me for lunch tomorrow?
2007-06-24 08:29:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by HoHo Joe 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, to the people who reads this smut.
2007-06-24 08:28:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by WC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
art would be more believeable than literature.........sex is sex, theres no art to that, even in pictures
2007-06-28 07:41:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
its friggin perverted garbage. but thats my opinion.
2007-06-24 08:29:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by beatch38 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol yeah right
2007-06-24 08:28:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by logan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
only if your a pimp daddy
2007-06-24 08:28:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by cybersurfa 2
·
0⤊
0⤋