the rotal family have no power over the countrys affairs. if you mean prime minister then yes it would be nice to be able tochose the leader of the winning party instead of the party chosing for you, but i guess they chose the person they feel will represent them best.
2007-06-24 00:38:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by raynor_11 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I just love Status Quo! (well, someone had to say it, didn't they?).
I would dispose of the Royal Family - they are very expensive and do nothing apart from bring in tourists - I am sure that Thomas Cook can do equally as well. Having stopped paying out for all their lackeys, we can pay to repair the buildings that belong to the country (that they live in) and bring them up to standard so that the tourists can actually visit them - and since we aren't paying out all that money to them, it actually won't cost too much to get into the building and have a look around.
As it happens, the Queen has no real say in what goes on and it is the Prime Minister that does - if the rest of his cabinet agree!
So, while we do have the right to vote in our decision maker - what I really would like to be able to do is to also have the right to vote him/her out if I/we didn't think that they were performing well enough! That might make them think a bit more!
2007-06-24 08:23:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I personally would like to vote on every issue. I would like to hear all sides of all arguments. That is why I registered with myverdict.net.
2007-06-24 07:54:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Taffd 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not a Brit, but if you mean the royal family, they've no power at all - are just figureheads, albeit expensive ones.
2007-06-24 07:35:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by gortamor 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The royal family don't worry me, but having a new prime minister foisted on us, really gets up my nose
2007-06-24 07:33:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, zzz, zzz, zzz, boring!
2007-06-24 10:06:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋