English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Your thoughts on the above statement please?

2007-06-23 21:51:35 · 30 answers · asked by mia 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Cogito ergo, I am a grandmother, had you been more mature and capable of mature debate I would not have felt inclined to lower myself to personal defamation, however since your alacrity of thought is not the finest: you are very funny, to accuse me of hate mongering whilst defending, that cruel idiotic turd Bush is the best joke I've heard all week. May I suggest in future you engage what little brain you pocess before you post answers, your assumptions are so wrong, you funny little man.

2007-06-23 22:04:49 · update #1

Mutley, I'd really like to know your thoughts

2007-06-23 22:08:24 · update #2

Cogito you are a supporter of the biggest mass murderer alive today, the guy is almost as big an idiot as you. I do not for one moment believe you have the intellectual capacity to enter into any debate, you are guilty of being a closed minded, hate filled bigot, you have blood on your hands fool. Jumping to assumptions about me shows your immaturity. But you're still a funny bunny who made me laugh. I think you have an amazing talent to be able to stand on your hands and talk out of you a*se, wow!

2007-06-23 23:12:49 · update #3

Pro Bush idiots, how can loathing and being repulsed by a devious fool be considered hate mongering you are talking about an evil man who is responsible for countless deaths.

2007-06-23 23:17:39 · update #4

Stone K I did not start the insults, however I feel silly bullies should be stood up to.

2007-06-24 06:49:38 · update #5

My loathing of the repercussions of the decisions to go to war made by the biggest war monger in the world i.e bush, couldn't be seen as war mongering even with the most inadequate and flawed logic, those who accuse me of either bigotry or war mongering whilst suppoting bush (idiot)must surely be looking at their own reflection, it is foolish of you to make such an illogical leap. I feel hope because the majority of Americans and people who answered this realize he is a monster

2007-06-24 07:25:47 · update #6

30 answers

mia, the Yahoo problem is that the American Republicans that support Bush (25%) have been falsefying information on the web while Bill Clinton was President up to the present. They want the American politics pages to appear to be fully Bush supported with his Nation wide 25% approval ratings. America is insulted and appauld by the Bush Administration, and the constant paid spamming by the Republican propagandist isn't real or true. They have been spamming Yahoo and other chat sources heavily since they lost the last Novembers election for Congress to the Democrats. The Republicans are using the Iraq War to embezzel American tax payer money and they have laundered billions through the war to cover up their agendas. The war is being used as a loop hole to re-write our US Constitution and Bill of Rights. The results of all this are obvious World Wide with the current rate of inflation, IE: cost of gasoline, and oil. The Republican propagandist doesn't want any of this to end because they are also making billions off of others pain and mysery. Bush and the Republicans are bean counters, other peoples lives don't mean squat to them including the lost lives of your British soldiers, and Aulstrailian soldiers. The Republicans also have a mercenary army (BlackWater USA) of 200,000 EX-SPECIAL forces soldiers that are being paid as sub-contractors through Richard Cheney's (Vice-President) Halliburton (KBR). This army is in addition to the American and coalition forces of 150,000 on the ground in Iraq and Afganistan. The American Republican propagandist is using fake multiple profiles (trolls) to sway opinions and try to control this network. That is what all the constant hate speach towards others that don't agree with their actions is all about. They will have you violated and remove your questions for even asking. I don't call that freedom of speach, or even a value of American democracy, and neither does the rest of America that opposes George W Bush and the 25%.

2007-06-24 11:55:19 · answer #1 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 9 1

If it were the first time that I suspected that he had ever lied I would be shocked by the above statement. Since the beginning of the war in Iraq, he has misled people around the world. 1000's died, I think that is probably to conservative. Just like he is. It's a mystery to me why he is still in office. Impeachment proceedings should have been undertaken long ago. As a American I feel as though he is holding this country hostage by being in office. Actually your question has brought o mind a question I feel compelled to ask.

2007-06-24 07:05:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

It's well known that his father wanted Sadam Hussein, it was his agenda. I'm not saying that Hussein didn't need to be taken out of power, but it should have been done for the right reasons, not based on lies and deceit. The weapons of mass destruction didn't exist.

2007-06-25 14:02:29 · answer #3 · answered by mightymite1957 7 · 2 1

George W. Bush got fewer brains than anybody I can think of, well I might know somebody more stupid, (that's the first lie I've told today) He is a uneducated killer who can't figure out how to chew a pretzel and watch a football game without passing out.

For what reason did 1000s of men and women die? To defend what target? -- Saddam was no threat, but Bush wanted that oil and now he's got it, (well, sort of).

Now, we have 100s grieving families who have 'kissed daddy goodbye' and never saw him again, all because Bush lied to get into a war that would make his family untold billions.

God bless (and have mercy upon) America!

2007-06-24 00:48:18 · answer #4 · answered by Kedar 7 · 7 3

Center for Public Integrity is a bastion of far left liberals and liberal propaganda. Wise up and don't be so stupid and naive. Why is it every time the Liberals are the last to know what they are even quoting for truth? Simply amazing! Despite its claims to be a nonpartisan news organization and profession of the Society of Professional Journalists code of ethics, the Center has been accused of bias towards left-wing political causes because it has accepted money from organizations and individuals that favor liberal policies and/or actively oppose right-wing political causes. This group is funded by the same man (George Soros) that funded the extreme left wing group MoveOnDotOrg, the origination to prevent the impeachment of Clinton that now claims to be an anti-war group. It gets funding from the far left liberal, Funding from Bill Moyers. Writing in The Wall Street Journal in March of 2005, commentator John Fund accused the Center of being a member of what he termed the "campaign finance lobby." Citing a speech by Sean Treglia, former program manager at Pew Charitable Trusts, Fund argued that a "stealth campaign" by "eight liberal foundations" fomented a false sense of public demand for new restrictions on the financing of public campaigns. In the course of his essay, Fund singled out the Center as a front group pushing Pew's agenda. DIRECTORS: Bill Buzenberg - Douglas Bennet, who was Director of the Agency for International Development under Jimmy Carter, appointed his long time friend and London correspondent Bill Buzenberg to NPR Vice President for News Hodding Carter - Carter was an unabashed supporter of the Kennedy's and their quest for the American presidency -- all of them: JFK, RFK and Teddy. He had dinner with Bobby Kennedy and his family the night before RFK was assassinated. He was also working for him "campaigning, making talks, and writing ghost speeches." Bruce A. Finzen - Donates numerous times to the Robins Kaplan PAC Democratic election fund. Bill Kovach - Bill Kovach is a former Washington bureau chief of The New York Times. Paula Madison - Paula Madison's brother (Elrick Williams) raised controversy when his 2-year-old toddler donated $2300 to Sen. Barack Obama, along with every member of his family. Geneva Overholser - Geneva Overholser resigned her seat with the National Press Foundation in protest over them naming Fox News’ anchor Brit Hume Broadcaster of the Year.

2016-04-01 01:48:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush lying about things is as predictable as the sun coming up tomorrow. If he were to start telling the truth about the things he has done, that would be refreshing. His proposed troop surge to wind down the war is crap. He is more concerned with what to order for his dinner, than resolving his mistakes. I for one loath the guy, and can't wait for the next presidential inauguration.

2007-06-24 08:56:11 · answer #6 · answered by InDyBuD2002 4 · 6 2

being a Grandmother doesn't set the limitations of definition.
I agree most here are not here to hone their cognitive resources

You asked what people think and you got some answers.
Signing off and looking past political drool are two different things.

what you have submitted here is DNC hyperbole designed at
ignoring purpose-setting yourself up as the bottom-line opinion-and offering some of the less-profound intellects here a chance to say vile things about Bush

it would be different if your attack style was aimed and included those who submit rhetorical ignorance -no matter where they fall on the War.

So I stand by my premise that your statement "Bush lied and 1000's died" is nothing more than the submission of an obsessed redundant ex-hippy wishing for the better days.

2007-06-24 01:34:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

So what are you going to do about it?
This Bush lied prior to the first election, and how he cheated in the first election and second election. So why should this be a surprise about the war and his misbehaviors. Pay attention and read the newspaper before you vote. We just simply have too many dumb people here in the United States of America. Only the people of the United States of America can choose to be smart or to be stupid by proofing themselves through the next election.

2007-06-23 21:58:24 · answer #8 · answered by SweetBrunette 5 · 6 4

Firstly once he was found out to be a liar his should have been removed from office [you can never trust a liar]. 1000's died very very sad, but I don't think death is the end although it could be. I just hope what goes around comes around fate will play a part, this is a hard question to answer, there are loads of things to consider,,,,,, he lied, no smoke without fire, not knowing the in's and out's it's hard to make a constructive reply sorry Mia xxxxx

2007-06-23 22:17:39 · answer #9 · answered by P-H 2 · 3 3

Unfortunately not enough people care, also despite his approval ratings, Bush still has a hardcore base. How dare you try to start a debate!!!! ha! It makes people uncomfortable to know that the person they helped elect has made so many poor decisions and lied along the way. Bush will go down in history as the worst President ever!

2007-06-23 21:58:21 · answer #10 · answered by ginnyp82 2 · 9 4

fedest.com, questions and answers